Dream house floor plan - 173m² with 3 children's rooms

Hello 11ant,
nice that you also wrote something.

I did promise that, in the year-end business only the delivery times are longer. What was important to me at first was to give others priority (although I find it a shame that there were no bets on what I would respond to and especially on what first).

We will definitely take the measurements you mentioned into account in our further planning phase. [...] We also debated back and forth about the trash bins. They stand in the garage more or less as placeholders. At the moment, I see a triple box on the north side as the most sensible solution. So, here are the original dimensions for such boxes:

Where does this drawing come from again – why was something traced over that, what is the purpose of breaking the "cold chain" of the digital planning? – I find that pretty unprofessional. I don’t understand why you hire an architect (and proceed with her through performance phase 3) if you then leave essentials like the trash bins and the coordination between bicycles and cars to fate. Planning is there to plan!

From performance phase 4 onwards, the architect of the house building company takes over. Hopefully, he knows what he is doing then.

From my point of view, you have (in terms of process) made quite a nonsense plan: an architect who does not plan system-specifically would have been better off giving measurement suggestions only "to the nearest decimeter" with wall thicknesses (4 dm / 2 dm) and all room dimensions. I would have expected at least a coordination of the major steps with her planning grid. Deviating once in a while from a grid with justification is not the same as anarchically doing things like Pippi Longstocking from the start. The next mistake was the order in which the architect went through performance phases 1 to 3 en suite. Meanwhile, I endlessly preach the importance of dough rest. I don’t understand how you can skip setting the course – but even then the dough rest keeps its importance. Now you are making a request round whose findings no longer flow into performance phase 3. And the poor manufacturer planner is now supposed to mumble together a performance phase 4 from this structurally flawed performance phase 3. In this respect, I have to fear that with

The first three are booked. Thanks again for your suggestions.

the first three mean the water pistols and that my suggestions fell on deaf ears.

We have also heard that from other experts (to be taken literally). Honestly: we directly kicked out 3 offers. I wouldn’t have thought that the range for our house lies somewhere between 3k and 4.5k per square meter. Our calculation maybe still works somewhat up to 3.5k per square meter.
For now, we have condensed our comparison to three providers and will soon go into pre-selection with them. It was/is stressful though.

Thirdly, I make such request rounds so cheaply myself (although I don’t know the prices of colleagues, but they certainly can’t be pharmacies either) that I fail to understand why you want to do it yourself. Secondly, there is a nearly force-locked causal connection between the inquiry basis and the bid spread. And first, as you can see here, it backfires that the calculative course correction potential can no longer flow in where it belongs and where it would be useful, namely between LPs 2 and 3. Now performance phase 4 has to build on a non-deburred performance phase 3, which, as these figures tell you, means more than ten percent additional fuel consumption on the further flight. This could have been easily avoided, simply by doing the same steps in the right order. The old white man does not say all this because he likes to be right; decades of practice are behind it. I just cook with water too, but perfectly at one hundred degrees. What do you mean by directly kicking out three participants: three bids beyond a debatable higher price threshold?

We have meanwhile agreed about 90% to omit the door for now. I’m still working on the remaining 10%. We are still undecided whether to do it with or without a lintel. Do you have a tip? In any case, later – with three pubescent treasures – we could smartly install a door there.

I don’t understand the question about the lintel. I would make a "single-leaf" passage in the format possibly later with a door (but larger than the rebate cladding) and already leave out the frame or replace it with “plaster.” Or one could even make a passage frame, exactly in the format of a standard door. Then no door would be hanging open and only the frame would be exchanged later. This is all planned, no magic and no fiddling.

Hello dear ones,

I don't want to dig up the topic unnecessarily, but it was largely about the transition from the hallway to the living-dining-cooking area. I came up with a solution that allows a generous access to the [WEK-Bereich] and at the same time creates space for an internal sliding door. However, this would require changes to the wardrobe as well as a redesign of the study. I have compared the original ground floor (left) with my alternative proposal (right). The cabinet depths have remained the same.

What do you think about it?

Hello dear ones, I don't want to unnecessarily dig up the topic, but it was largely about the transition from the hallway to the living-dining-cooking area. In the process, a solution occurred to me that allows generous access to the WEK area and at the same time creates space for an internal sliding door. However, this would require changes to the wardrobe as well as a redesign of the study. I have compared the original ground floor (left) with my alternative proposal (right). The cabinet depths have remained the same. What do you think about it?

Foreword: Your floor plan for the ground floor is almost identical to how we built. For us, only the WC and technical room have been swapped because we have a flat-roof extension on the right side. Otherwise, apart from a few meters here and there, it's really almost identical. For us, the passage to kitchen/living/dining is not as wide as yours because we still have a pantry in the kitchen corner. Therefore, we have a sliding door installed in the hallway. It hardly takes up any space.

Thank you very much for your suggestion!

We are not quite at the point where we have made all the final decisions. Do you still like the floor plan you chose for your house? It would be great if you could share the floor plan here.

Thank you very much for your suggestion!

We are not quite there yet that we have decided everything. Do you still like the floor plan you chose for your house? It would be great if you could share the floor plan here.

Yes, we are still very satisfied with it.

My floor plan is basically identical to your "open" variant, except that there is a small pantry in the upper right corner of the kitchen and the WC and technical room are swapped.

You lose a lot of (Stell)space in the small utility room on the ground floor due to the door and possibly windows.