Current financing offer from the house bank

  • Erstellt am 2022-01-24 10:38:10

hauskauf1987

2022-02-25 15:37:44
  • #1


So if there are 400k at the end, everything that can go wrong really has to go wrong (0 euros saved in 20 years, no inheritance received from the grandparents, etc.) When I think about it like that, I should probably just stay in my 1300 euro 80m2 rented apartment, which will still cost 1300 euros in 20 years :)
 

WilderSueden

2022-02-25 15:57:33
  • #2

It simply helps to assume that the other party is not stupid. Whether banks, building societies, or investors in the capital market, these are all people who professionally create or trade financial products. If they price things obviously massively wrong, they quickly go bankrupt. If something sounds too good to be true... then it is.

And especially building savings contracts... almost everyone has them and they come across so innocently. But if you look closely, they are one of the most complex financial products that a private individual deals with. Particularly in combination with other financial products or with large sums (keyword deposit insurance), various pitfalls await. In addition, due to the long term from the contract conclusion to the loan, there is a significant risk for the saver to have a claim to a cheap loan against an insolvent company.
 

askforafriend

2022-02-25 16:00:43
  • #3
And if it says 400k, then inflation has continued for 20 years. 400k in 20 years corresponds to a present value today (with 2% p.a. inflation) of 270,000 euros.
 

face26

2022-02-25 16:34:10
  • #4


Well... so I can certainly understand that many points are viewed critically, but this sounds almost as if building savings contracts were the devil's financial tool and would trigger the next financial crisis. It's not about the fact that there are pros and cons that one may point out... but the question is how they are presented.
 

askforafriend

2022-02-25 16:49:22
  • #5
I don't understand at all why people ever or currently take out a [Bausparvertrag]. For me, it's completely overpriced, non-transparent, and unnecessary.
 

WilderSueden

2022-02-25 17:35:25
  • #6

No, it’s definitely not that bad. But they do have some disadvantages that are definitely not well known to the general public. And especially if you’re speculating that interest rates will be much higher in 20 years, you have to ask yourself whether it’s realistic that the building societies will be able to economically meet all the cheap credit claims then.
With an annuity loan, the matter is much simpler. Once the loan has been paid out, you no longer have any risk if the bank goes bankrupt.
 

Similar topics
30.10.2008Credit vs Cash Payment15
28.09.2015Take more credit or sell?22
19.03.2016Building a house despite credit and Schufa19
17.02.2016Loan with annuity loan and 2 linked building savings contracts47
30.11.2016Only one credit component or several credit parts?19
22.01.2017Financing for house construction - desired loan / open credit22
17.06.2017Credit despite self-employment15
22.04.2019Real estate loan with high collateral but low ongoing income35
16.08.2019What loan amount is realistic for house construction?190
19.08.2019Criteria health questions credit42
30.04.2020KfW153 loan immediate repayment - prepayment penalty?24
13.08.2020Bridging the financial gap with a "bridge" loan12
03.01.2021Sell the asset or take more credit?135
31.12.2020Return to the homeland - how much credit can I afford?90
05.01.2021Renovation of an apartment in the parental home - loan, without being the owner?11
12.04.2021Is the construction project affordable? 570 k€ loan with a 5300 € salary144
06.07.2021KfW loan is expected to become cheaper from 01.07.58
10.05.2022Buy a house with equity and loan, renovate through property sale24
10.02.2023Combination of Bank & KFW Loan for Home Purchase and Renovation13
30.05.2025Bank for subordinated financing or second rank12

Oben