Current financing offer from the house bank

  • Erstellt am 2022-01-24 10:38:10

WilderSueden

2022-02-25 14:25:53
  • #1
No, it’s not that simple. A building savings contract has two phases: saving phase and loan phase. The transition occurs at the earliest when the contract is ready for allocation. To be ready for allocation, you usually have to save 40% of the building savings amount and additionally reach a certain points score (exact calculation and limit depend on the provider). To repay €200,000 in 20 years, you will need to save about €80,000 during that time. Ignoring interest (almost zero anyway) and the contract fee for now, this comes down to an annual deposit of €4,000 or €333 per month. Taking the contract fee into account, it’s considerably more. This is the minimum deposit; otherwise, there is no loan. Incidentally, this does not guarantee that you will be granted a suitable loan. The allocation still has various pitfalls.
 

nagner99

2022-02-25 14:28:03
  • #2


That’s just not really sensible.

On the one hand, low repayment and gambling, and on the other hand burning a lot of money with a building savings contract. It would probably have been cheaper to buy a longer fixed interest rate directly for what it now costs (contract fee, account management fee, and opportunity costs for the deposited amount).
 

WilderSueden

2022-02-25 14:38:20
  • #3
A little bit of self-promotion... I once wrote a blog post on the subject. Google can find it under "Warum ein TA Darlehen keine gute Idee ist".
 

Nemesis

2022-02-25 14:39:24
  • #4


For the sake of completeness, it should be mentioned that he can also split the home savings contract if he saves (too) little to reach the minimum home savings amount... but then he won’t have a €200k loan either and takes on more risk, so basically that’s not its purpose...



That’s important, yeah. "By the way," trading stocks or similar and then using the possible profit as a lump sum payment into the home savings contract to reach the minimum home savings amount is simply not enough. Valuation number is the key word.
 

MayrCh

2022-02-25 14:49:32
  • #5
I hope hauskauf1987 will still see it that way in 20 years, that is in his mid-50s and with a >400K€ heavy follow-up financing.
 

hauskauf1987

2022-02-25 15:35:52
  • #6
Thank you You’re absolutely right, I had a faulty line of thought there ;-) I’ll reconsider. The conversation is on Monday. The original plan was minimal savings and then, with high interest, just to take something saved from the building savings deposit to use the low interest rate. But apparently it’s not that simple :D
 

Similar topics
30.10.2008Credit vs Cash Payment15
12.09.2015Repayment or Repayment + Home Savings Plan10
16.09.2015Home bank financing, building society saver, repayment11
18.03.2016Should you "almost empty" the building savings account?13
26.07.2016Calculation of equity capital in connection with KfW loan28
21.07.2017Is this financing offer good?23
18.08.2017No building savings/little equity and construction/purchase plans in the near future?18
04.07.2019TA loan with building saver - read a lot, yet did not find the catch.13
16.08.2019What loan amount is realistic for house construction?190
04.11.2019Ongoing home savings contract regarding special repayment and allocation maturity18
03.01.2021Sell the asset or take more credit?135
05.01.2021Renovation of an apartment in the parental home - loan, without being the owner?11
12.04.2021Is the construction project affordable? 570 k€ loan with a 5300 € salary144
29.06.2021Financing the purchase of a single-family home: Lower interest rate or longer term?32
10.05.2022Buy a house with equity and loan, renovate through property sale24
25.11.2022Increase repayment or top up building savings?20
17.03.2023Private loan - what should be considered?16
11.10.2023New construction with KFN 297, building savings and interim financing14
09.09.2024Bridge loan before allocation of home savings contract18
17.01.2025Financing offer single-family house including building savings, experiences25

Oben