...
But I certainly must not and will not accept a massive health hazard to my children!
How the owner handles that is nmfp (=Not my f**** problem). But if he doesn't get the problem under control, he then must not complain if others solve the problem in their own way.
The owner can also offer to clean the fully sh*** garden every (!) day. Then the problem would be solved. If the owner is too lazy for that, okay, then other measures must be taken.
Andreas
Then here comes a cat hater who still has a neutral view:
You won't get through any court that ever deals with this. Massive health hazard, the term is not proportionate. If you let a child into nature, whether garden or public playground – you must always expect that, for example, the child gets stung by something, there is a shard of glass lying around somewhere, or an object of desire could be put into the mouth. I bet there are far more "dangers" lurking in your garden than from this sh*** pile. For example, dangerous worms or poisonous plants. Thorns on branches... And if it's wild animals, you can't do anything anyway. Nature was here before us idiots, so you just have to tolerate it as it is. Just because you are listed in the land register and have a fence around your property, you cannot keep out external influences, or do you put up warning signs for bees and hornets? Show the child what it is and that it's yucky. You do that with other things too, right?
If a person has no problems, they make some for themselves.... just be calm and merciful! It’s not hard.