Regarding size: yes – here we had on the one hand planned a certain “reserve” for possible family growth.
Reserve for family growth by heads due to unplanned latecomers or multiples is fine and sounds reasonable. But surface area that would allow all already existing family members to become outrageously fat, I would not call that “reserve.”
And another living room in the basement just for pin-the-tail-on-the-donkey or indoor egg-and-spoon races at children's birthday parties definitely has a touch of Richie Rich *LOL*
Do you mean garage regarding width / driveway?
I mean that with a smaller house, one could angle the garage more favorably towards the driveway. Without a parking assistant, you really end up straining your shoulder even with power steering* and also end up wiping the entire yard clean of standing Bobby cars during the maneuvering process, not to mention the fact that the dog cannot leave his squeaky duck lying around there.
*) not necessarily acute, but after five years a chronic pain has developed – so now everyone reading this can feel free to think that 11ant is exaggerating again...
Well, I actually find the design pretty good.
I do too – but also not quite sincerely based on a "false business premise": in the presentation, the house stands lonely on a huge clearing – these viewing distances never actually occur in reality as drawn.
Kniestock unfortunately only 80 cm
The attic is a bit our challenge...
Not really with so much area. And architecturally, as a vacuum cleaner kneewall, that is extraordinarily generous.
How do you see the air space?
In general, I see air space as a gimmick or as an element of the rich-people architecture of the 80s and early 90s. Really retro, baby. But who knows: Magnum has just been relaunched, maybe Miami Vice will come back too, and shoulder pads.