Samantheus
2021-05-19 14:26:56
- #1
Hello everyone,
I am currently planning the construction of a single-family house in a municipality that has a very strict parking space regulation.
Current situation with us:
We are a family of three (2 adults, 1 child, 2 years old) and are planning to build a single-family house with just over 200 sqm of living space. We have 1 car. We plan to build a double garage that also offers parking space for two additional cars in front of the garage.
Demands of the building authority:
According to the parking space regulation (according to the building authority, no room for discussion), 3 additional parking spaces are required, thus 7 parking spaces in total! This is justified by the parking regulation which states that 1 parking space is required for every started 50 sqm of living space (thus 5 in our case) and that parking spaces in front of the garage are not recognized regardless of size (thus 7 in our case).
Conclusion:
From our point of view (and also from the construction companies we have spoken to), this is an absolutely unacceptable situation. The 4 parking spaces we are planning should be more than enough for a family of three with one car. The demand for 7 parking spaces does not seem justifiable with common sense.
Questions/further procedure:
From my point of view, there are now two possibilities for how to deal with this.
Option 1: Ignore the requirement. Submit the building application with the 7 parking spaces but simply do not build the other 3. According to the builder, "no one ever checks this afterward."
Option 2: Submit a request for an exemption as part of the building application and, if this (as expected) is rejected, involve a lawyer to enforce the right.
My question now is: How do you see this? Do you know similar situations? What would you recommend? Could it, for example, be problematic if one decides on Option 1 and then someone comes after 10 years? Would the legal dispute then possibly no longer be possible because the parking spaces are marked? In principle, I would prefer to take Option 1 first and if there are problems, take the matter to court. The worst case would be if this option no longer exists and all 7 parking spaces really have to be built. We do not want to clutter our garden with parking spaces that are never needed.
Thank you very much in advance!
Best regards
Sam[/B]
I am currently planning the construction of a single-family house in a municipality that has a very strict parking space regulation.
Current situation with us:
We are a family of three (2 adults, 1 child, 2 years old) and are planning to build a single-family house with just over 200 sqm of living space. We have 1 car. We plan to build a double garage that also offers parking space for two additional cars in front of the garage.
Demands of the building authority:
According to the parking space regulation (according to the building authority, no room for discussion), 3 additional parking spaces are required, thus 7 parking spaces in total! This is justified by the parking regulation which states that 1 parking space is required for every started 50 sqm of living space (thus 5 in our case) and that parking spaces in front of the garage are not recognized regardless of size (thus 7 in our case).
Conclusion:
From our point of view (and also from the construction companies we have spoken to), this is an absolutely unacceptable situation. The 4 parking spaces we are planning should be more than enough for a family of three with one car. The demand for 7 parking spaces does not seem justifiable with common sense.
Questions/further procedure:
From my point of view, there are now two possibilities for how to deal with this.
Option 1: Ignore the requirement. Submit the building application with the 7 parking spaces but simply do not build the other 3. According to the builder, "no one ever checks this afterward."
Option 2: Submit a request for an exemption as part of the building application and, if this (as expected) is rejected, involve a lawyer to enforce the right.
My question now is: How do you see this? Do you know similar situations? What would you recommend? Could it, for example, be problematic if one decides on Option 1 and then someone comes after 10 years? Would the legal dispute then possibly no longer be possible because the parking spaces are marked? In principle, I would prefer to take Option 1 first and if there are problems, take the matter to court. The worst case would be if this option no longer exists and all 7 parking spaces really have to be built. We do not want to clutter our garden with parking spaces that are never needed.
Thank you very much in advance!
Best regards
Sam[/B]