If you are already arguing with them, you can be almost sure that a note will be made in the files and an inspection will (eventually) be carried out. You don't even have to be at home for that. At some point, a letter will land in the mailbox.
I share that concern. Therefore, I am considering possibly not applying for the exemption at all, but instead to include the dummy parking spaces when applying for the building permit right away. The question is what "obligation" you are committing to with that and whether and how you can still get out of it if necessary.
Try Escorda’s suggestion.
I will definitely bring that to the next meeting with the construction company.
Of course that is possible. The development plan shows where it is allowed. Has the architect submitted a building inquiry regarding the changed access? At least that’s what I would have done first.
The whole thing is being planned by the general contractor’s planner. We discussed the topic of a building inquiry intensively; at first, we had planned that too. However, the planner advised us against it. The reasoning was that an informal building inquiry does not provide any security, and a formal inquiry with binding effect is actually about as time-consuming as the building permit application itself. But due to the longer lead time and summer holiday break regarding council meetings, the planned construction start would probably be delayed because the building permit might not be granted in time. We were at the building authority with the sketches, and the colleague there considered the access issue uncritical.