Sell the asset or take more credit?

Expensive rented living space is still more social than prevented living space

It is not tax-free

Compared to stocks, it is taxed negligibly after a certain holding period

A meadow of nature helps with that:p

Compared to stocks, it is taxed negligibly after a certain holding period

As if stocks were taxed fairly from a societal perspective. :rolleyes: It's totally ridiculous to compare one imbalance with another and then conclude an injustice from that.

Expensively rented living space is still more social than prevented living space

Expensively rented living space is still more social than prevented living space

Well... not necessarily. What exactly do you want to achieve with the then available plots? Those who build their single-family houses on them can also afford the rent. Those who can’t afford either the plot or the house also can’t afford the then high rents. In fact, nothing is gained at all.
Arguments would really be nice, but barstool slogans don’t help here. Unless you are paid by the forum operator to generate traffic.

You are confusing something, I am opposing a certain form of investment because it has negative consequences for others. And I don't even want to ban it, just moderately tax it. And already everyone here feels triggered

Moderate sounds different.
So the property is gone after 10 years.

It's time for a hefty special land tax on undeveloped building land; I advocate 5 to 10 percent of the standard land value per year. Then the shortage of building plots would quickly be resolved