Sell the asset or take more credit?

  • Erstellt am 2020-12-25 20:09:05

Ötzi Ötztaler

2020-12-29 20:54:13
  • #1
You are distracting from the topic again, Rick.

How many properties are you hoarding? ;)

By the way, my own house construction was almost perversely well subsidized by the state thanks to Greta and election campaign and family blabla :p
 

rick2018

2020-12-29 21:09:31
  • #2
No, it wasn’t a distraction but just a response to .

None. Only one built for owner occupation and a few rented properties.

Sure, there are currently some subsidies. We could have received some for certain things. But I didn’t take advantage of (all) of them. Financially unwise, I already pay a lot of taxes... but you don’t have to take everything. In the end, those who already pay the most taxes (percentage-wise and also nominally) have to foot the bill again. Since subsidy funds are often limited, the support certainly benefits a young family more.
 

pagoni2020

2020-12-29 21:32:59
  • #3

Where does it say that you have to justify yourself?
"Weird society" - Well, we only have this one, but I hardly know any that would be better or one in which I would rather live, or you?

Never received a gift? Sad. Neither inheritance nor gifts are forbidden or reprehensible.
There are millionaires/billionaires with an extremely high social conscience who voluntarily give a lot of money and time back to society, and low earners who would kill grandma over €10. Financial status says absolutely NOTHING about a person's social behavior. I don't care at all whether someone received their money as a gift, inherited it, or worked for it, hard or easy, no matter. He/she should simply behave as socially as possible, whether wealthy or less wealthy.

See above "weird society": I can name you a whole series of countries where the term "short-time work" doesn't even exist, and that alone is a privilege. Even though I do not make use of it, I find it good that such a thing exists. Homebuilders also benefit from the community fund, such as .....Kfw funds, Baukindergeld, etc., which is also okay.

That's just your job. You had the free choice of profession, so it should be okay. I also have 20 years of shift work behind me, chosen freely, and I enjoyed doing it. There were disadvantages but also advantages and I liked the package, otherwise I could have changed it. I now know quite a few who voluntarily work longer instead of retiring (10% surcharge). So it can't always be that bad, or the filthy lucre lures more than the work is bad. For example, I had Tuesdays off when others worked... so what...

I had a job that society regards as hard (overrated), and we liked to complain a lot too. I enjoyed my job, it felt like my hobby, and I was not in a quiet office or far away from risky places but right in the middle.
BUT: if it had not suited me anymore I would have changed and paid the price for it. Some cannot imagine changing their profession, let alone changing their place of residence, some already lose it when they have to change offices (true!). I had a lot of changes and few paid off financially but the gained quality of life did.
Therefore, I like to recommend the classic to complaining people: "Love it, change it or leave it, otherwise be silent." Just having this option at all is a great gift.

We should all simply realize that we are in a certain way "privileged," without necessarily feeling bad/guilty about it. That’s probably what this is more about, I think.

But in everyday life, unfortunately, this does not mean that with increasing responsibility the payment increases; often it is rather the opposite, that the simple electrician, bus driver, truck driver, or nurse/caregiver etc. bear high responsibility with low pay. A wrong decision or carelessness can have immediate deadly consequences, whereas from middle or upper management levels in various areas direct responsibility/consequences are often limited.
I envy no one anything and share the view of that all of us could often do with some humility and grounding, myself included, of course. surely also knows from experience better that high salaries alone do not make people more satisfied.
 

Tolentino

2020-12-29 21:37:10
  • #4
Well then, either large shared apartments or simply everything where the same space is inhabited by several people. Mind you, I am not in favor of older people being pressured to leave their house, but it is neither social nor even socialist if two people live in a house that was formerly inhabited by three, four or more people.
 

rick2018

2020-12-29 21:41:05
  • #5
Good that ours is always only inhabited by two people :p
 

Tolentino

2020-12-29 21:54:59
  • #6
;) I don’t want to moralize here, but I think it’s clear that most people here are significantly privileged. I believe it’s good to regularly be a little less self-righteous and to look at one’s position in this world with a bit more gratitude and humility. That’s all.
 

Similar topics
01.01.2018Which control system? Control heating/ventilation/air conditioning with an app31
26.07.2021Central control of roller shutters - What solution?80

Oben