The building is done with .
At the moment, the drawings are being made by the architect. That’s why I don’t have the opportunity to upload anything for you.
The house measures 13x6.5m, 1.5 storeys. [> / >] That was a half-turned staircase. But the show house was much larger.
2:1 is a very steep floor plan "cross-section," which typically leads to unfavorable layouts with increased area consumption especially in the area of traffic routes (which cannot be compensated solely by the stair floor area) and the storage spaces near the knee wall.
Reducing functioning templates is rarely a blessed attempt.
But I will upload our finished floor plan in the coming days...
Don’t forget the plot!
We also have a log house, and without the forum it would have become a – I quote – "dark dwarf cave," because a lot really looks different when built from wood than when you build "normally"! [> / >]
I meant that figuratively, meaning that you have to plan differently in a wooden house because it has completely different basic conditions.
Did you leave the wood everywhere as visible "masonry" untreated, or merely refrained from block house-typical excessive floor-to-ceiling windows?
Modern log house construction methods dispense with the crossing overhangs that were usual in earlier constructions (even if they are often faked folklorically), so I do not understand the "completely different basic conditions." There are even building systems with milled-in installation grooves. Today’s log house builders often belong to the "CAD+CNC" generation. There is nothing left of Almöhi and "man in the mountains." More log houses stand in new residential areas from Bielefeld to Uhlenbusch than on alpine mountain pastures. I recently saw a video from a provider who even explicitly mentioned clinker facades (NiTo).