OK...the discussion about whether one can live well on 3000 euros originated from this post:
Acquaintances of ours with 6k net are looking for a townhouse in Munich with a total volume (so absolutely everything included) up to the amount of 1.3 million.
There are, for example, nice newly built townhouses in Nymphenburg for that.
And it's actually possible to finance.
They have a good 400k equity. Loan amount would be 900k. The bank offered them 1% for 15 years. So with a rate of 3000 it would be paid off in 30 years.
We also have the rate of 3000. I don't see a problem getting along well with the remaining 3000 [...]
So the pure rate is 3000 euros. That should definitely not be compared to the warm rent!
So the remaining 3000 euros are not "for living." There are additional costs like utilities. Reserves for repairs/maintenance. Daycare fees are paid according to income. So with 6000 euros you are also far up there.
Even if it sounds lofty: From my point of view, not much is left over.
That's where it already starts to get stressful when the city wants a few thousand euros for new street lamps.
So please don't get polemic with phrases like "I don't need a Porsche."
It starts much smaller.
And then you stand in Munich in the million-euro neighborhood and nice restaurants and whatnot, but can hardly afford them.
That may not even be bad. The question is just why you want to live so centrally then. If it HAS TO be, that's another story. But from my point of view, the statement was too general that it would be totally fine with a 50% SHARE OF THE RATE! of the income.
If you voluntarily only work 5 hours a day, that’s a calculable luxury you afford yourself. Similar to a hobby that costs a few thousand euros a month.
Just like the hobby, you can give it up again if things get tight and work more.
That is not comparable to someone who has no room for maneuver with their income.