Floor plan Bungalow 172 m2 in Brandenburg south of Berlin

  • Erstellt am 2022-01-14 15:18:50

ypg

2022-08-02 10:09:49
  • #1


You are now completely ignoring the January discussion!

Yes, that did come from Würfel ;)

I have the feeling that _you_ rather give too much value to the home cinema. No one wants to take away your hobby or your daily routine in the home cinema, but the presence on the property cannot be overlooked.

That is really borderline, considering that there will probably also be a seating terrace there.
I would also shift it similarly to the right side of the plan, so that there is still a view of the rest of the property at the top of the plan.
 

K a t j a

2022-08-02 10:51:38
  • #2
I find 5m to the boundary rather nothing, especially since with 763sqm you are not exactly blessed with a tiny plot that would make it necessary to squeeze the terrace against the neighbor’s fence. I would question the double carport. Maybe it would be better if you use the edge development on the left and right for the cars, if that is allowed.
 

Sorrow87

2022-08-02 12:13:17
  • #3


Home builders are mostly not trained professionals from the construction industry and therefore seek advice. Of course, you can go straight to the architect or directly to the general contractor, who will competently and professionally advise you for payment from the start, and then you build your little house with your several hundred thousand euros with the contractor on duty. But most of the time, you only work with one company, and as a layperson, you do not always know in the big shark tank of the construction industry whether you are just throwing money out of the window or being competently advised and served.

The wise and smart layperson reads up and seeks a second independent opinion from third parties. But where do I start with literature research? At Google and the like? Then I discover a forum called House Building Forum, where some (hobby) experts in the house building industry, alongside admins, moderators, silent readers, and lay questioners, mingle.

If you register in a forum with the topic "House Building" and aim to regularly comment on other posts, I find it somewhat poor to only give praise or point out problems without appealing suggested solutions. That’s precisely what a forum offers: exchange among each other with the goal that everyone benefits. Yes, and for free. Don’t we all want to approach a project better prepared and save money in the process? Isn’t it also nice that you can help others?

I agree that you don’t have to feel responsible for a problem solution, but please don’t speak for others here. There are also other commentators who certainly decide for themselves what they see as their voluntary task here.

When you say that my architect alone is responsible for the solutions, there is a slight undertone suggesting that I shouldn’t have it too easy. In the end, the architect creates the final design, but I can talk to him until then. And in this process, opinions but especially ideas and solution approaches from third parties (friends, family, and also, for example, (hobby) experts from a forum) can be incorporated.



Of course, it is initially tough to receive a lot of criticism and to go on the defensive first, which is probably humanly understandable. You also want to explain your own intellectual property.

I have taken a lot of that to heart. Brought light from the southwest orientation into the living space. Moved away from the square and field roof. Reduced the footprint by almost 30 m2. Taken heart with a guest WC, now even with a shower and not next to the dining area. It also seems that the interior of the house is no longer a huge problem, except for the passage through the bedroom, but almost only the outdoor area remains.



Thanks for the suggestion. We would only reluctantly part with the [HAR] and the double carport, but we will include that in the next considerations. The area may only be a maximum of 150 m2; more is not possible. I also do not want to go back to the square. We no longer want a hip roof where we have seen the designs with the purlin roof. That already looks very nice from the outside.
 

K a t j a

2022-08-02 12:23:37
  • #4
Yes, I am known here for not making appealing solution suggestions. :rolleyes: Always nice when someone explains the world to me. Thanks for that.
 

Nida35a

2022-08-02 13:30:03
  • #5
, here in the forum and and are known for offering well-thought-out solutions and floor plans. They also have an eye for floor plans and their weaknesses. You believe you have a perfect floor plan for you, then go ahead and build it. Our approach for a bungalow in Berlin was, beautiful garden, holiday home feeling, living in and with the garden, the rest fell into place. If you feel like it, come and see what living in a bungalow means to us
 

ypg

2022-08-02 17:16:06
  • #6

Sorry. Solutions that involve more than a small illustrative pencil sketch or an explanatory talk take time.
If a thread starter (TS) behaves quite stubbornly (this doesn’t have to be just you, but generally speaking), against well-meaning, sensible, and also understandable arguments and does not take up (I don’t mean accept) these either, with no follow-up questions asking why, how, or “don’t you think that” or whatever, then I, for example, don’t spend several hours or days working out something that is a) buildable (without immense dream costs and structural effort), b) thought through (in terms of the needs/lifestyle of the TS or generally common daily routine) and c) empathetic to the TS. Whether it pleases is another matter.

I often spend several hours, sometimes several days, on bad layouts and many wishes... yes, because I’m into it. But also because there are “TSs” who honor me and my time or the design.
But I have no desire to do this if the TS fundamentally resists offers of help. Our objections or arguments can’t be all that bad if they can be found by others in other groups or forums as well. Sure, there are also only praise hymns there like here (less so), but that’s a good way to separate the wheat from the chaff when someone just says “great floor plan” and someone else points out that the kitchen is too tight, the cloakroom is missing, or the sightline AB or CD is not consistent.

Katja is similarly ambitious, maybe even more patient, even if she pursues another style.

In that sense, I find it a bit poor to only see one’s own post and not even look at what enthusiastic people you’re dealing with here. I always advise taking a look at other people’s posts in this forum to get a feeling for planning yourself. You only see your house now, we have been dealing with many houses from many questioners for years, and that broadens one’s perspective and builds empirical knowledge.

Yep. Only, we often have to pull information out of a TS, and there have already been thought processes. As far as I know, you haven’t even given your age yet. You don’t know if you’re dealing with a 30-year-old or a senior... Do we know if you have a normal daily schedule and only want to sit around in the media room? There was something about an outdoor shower, which just came up now?!… don’t quite remember … So I often find the exchange a bit one-sided. That must come at the beginning, not afterwards.

All that is demanded, and apparently you didn’t even google what Feng Shui from Würfel actually means, instead, it is casually “argued away.” Since Feng Shui is the teaching of the “dwelling human, i.e., the teaching of harmonious human life design,” that was basically an own goal. But I’ll let it be.
It shows your persistence, and no one here needs to impose themselves and their knowledge.

And now something about your words why our opinion does not reflect what you want:


Nobody said you should give up on a bungalow with home cinema.

Würfel has shown quite decently that a few things can be folded up there, or there is potential... even if it’s just a small initial idea… whereby you still have everything you describe. At least if you consider that it was quickly drafted between times. Many roads lead to Rome, one is faster, another slower, but more beautiful.

That’s probably how it will be. You quickly forget that there is also a plot behind the house if you don’t have that piece clearly before your eyes. It also becomes a burden if you have to walk generously several times in the evening around a building to get something from the garden shed. Then gardening loses its fun. And if the lady lies in bed with a migraine, the gentlemen’s sauna evening is off too…


Yes, something like that can be planned more cleverly.

Yep.
 

Similar topics
17.04.2016Value of land and bungalow B5511
02.03.2014Draft floor plan: Ground floor planning27
01.08.2014Duplex framework. Divide the plot?31
22.07.2015Draft floor plan bungalow - Your opinions please!14
07.04.2017Is a bungalow possible on a slope of around 20%?12
08.06.2018130 m² bungalow with double carport on a 600 m² plot?64
16.03.2018Old building on property - Bungalow extension - Various problems10
28.12.2018On which of these floor plans can we continue to build?287
15.09.2021Failed Floor Plan Collection Thread - Floor Plans That Nobody Wanted25
06.07.2019Bungalow floor plan, approx. 120 m²106
23.07.2019Floor plan design Bungalow 170 sqm40
16.10.2019Bungalow - does it make sense on a plot like this?21
26.03.2021Floor plan of a bungalow on already used land108
16.02.2021Floor plan for 137m^2 bungalow optimization40
07.02.2022Bungalow floor plan 5 rooms / garden in the north?33
26.10.2024Floor plan house with granny flat - improvement suggestions?221
19.12.2022Floor plan help needed for bungalow33
09.09.2024Floor plan design: Single-family house with basement; 560 sqm plot65
30.09.2024Floor plan bungalow 125 sqm conical plot39
20.11.2024Floor plan EFH165 sqm first draft - Architect dissatisfied74

Oben