Error in financing?

  • Erstellt am 2016-05-15 00:10:51

Uwe82

2016-06-07 10:59:39
  • #1
Or 30 years fixed interest rate ...
 

Henrik0817123

2016-06-07 11:04:00
  • #2
Someone clearly hasn't looked into the nominal interest rate for a 30-year term. Even the most shabby home savings contract is significantly cheaper. You can see how meaningful the statements here are... It is obviously NOT that simple to just bind for 30 years, and that's exactly why you end up in confusing constructions...
 

nasenmann

2016-06-07 11:18:24
  • #3


Of course it is simple. You just have to live with the offered interest rate

I’m also reading here somewhat amused. These are all pretty wild thought experiments and naturally nothing comes out of it.
Too much is simply too much.
Sure, no one can look into the crystal ball. Not even the banks, that’s why they try to play it safe with higher interest rates for longer terms.
In the end, however, it is the case that at the end of the term, which you can conclude at an acceptable interest rate for yourself, you should only have as much remaining debt that the expected crystal ball interest rate tends to whatever.
If that doesn’t fit, meaning you either still have too much outstanding debt after your desired fixed term or the remaining debt only fits with an infinite term at high interest rates, then it just doesn’t fit.
Actually quite simple.
 

Uwe82

2016-06-07 11:20:25
  • #4
Hmm, I wouldn't have thought that a building savings contract construct could be significantly cheaper than my secured 1.84% over 30 years ... but you must know ...
 

HilfeHilfe

2016-06-07 11:20:28
  • #5


why don't you ask your mortgage broker?

There are certainly acceptable 20-30 year fixed interest rates. The latter mostly with insurance companies. They only finance loans with equity involvement. Unfortunately, you don't have that.

You have full financing, which means no market power
 

Henrik0817123

2016-06-07 11:23:11
  • #6
Exactly – of course, I am referring to our situation. If you can get 1.84% on 30 years here, then you would definitely have also gotten a 1.25% home savings contract, maybe that would have even been cheaper. You can't generalize the topic like that. And that's exactly why I ask about the construct based on our situation.

If you write what you yourself got, unfortunately, that doesn't help at all.
 

Similar topics
30.10.2008Bank loan vs building savings contract?11
10.04.2012Financial plan with a building savings contract or with risk?12
30.04.2013Loan with an interest rate of 2.51% - Tips for financing22
24.10.2014Repay savings or save? + Secure interest rate47
18.04.2015Is a building savings contract still worthwhile with the current interest rates?10
28.06.2015Building a house - building savings contract with bad interest rates23
14.07.2020Beginnings of a possible property | Questions about the building savings contract72
29.05.2016Conditions for Riester home savings contract - What interest rate?16
02.06.2016Multifamily house - Building savings contract & pre-financing sensible?24
22.06.2016Is a TA loan sensible? Interest and loan offer are okay13
22.01.2017Which financing option, TH or building savings contract?23
18.01.2018Annuity loan vs. home savings contract - comprehension questions47
27.02.2018Old home savings contract - what should you do with it?31
06.03.2018Building savings contract and Wohnriester - Where is the catch here?28
28.05.2018Annuity loan vs. building savings contract 300k loan10
01.06.2019Financing with grace period loans + building savings contract50
06.07.2022How secure is the collateralization of the remaining debt via a home savings contract?17
15.12.2022Follow-up Financing 2030 Prepare Now Building Savings Contract/Special Repayment/Fixed Deposit64
06.03.2023Is a building savings contract with a high outstanding debt sensible as partial security?17
22.03.2024Home purchase financing despite high interest rates?24

Oben