Of course, I will briefly address any follow-up questions. Please explain to me how/where I have twisted even one thing by quoting? Thanks.
By the way, I reported your post because of the contained insults.
I reported yours too - then both can be deleted^^ But good that you still had to say it here again
Twisting because it reads as if that were the standard procedure? It doesn’t even include unemployment benefits, child benefits, etc., which would apply in such a case, and of course only for a short duration.
It’s really funny here... I have already asked many friends about this post, who have also built or worked in the financial industry, former bank clerks, etc... and really no one has remotely such concerns as the specialists here.
It rather sounds like "yes – having equity is always better, and 10 years ago it wouldn’t have been possible without it, but now many do it and it’s not worth saving first and then the interest rates go up, and in the end you have to pay longer when no income is coming anymore."
That’s how it all sounds – but presumably no one will even believe me now