3. Floor plan design new single-family house 220 sqm 2 full floors rooftop terrace

I like the upper floor much better now. But unfortunately, there are no storage surfaces, storage rooms, etc. Such a large house and yet so little 'space'.

Apparently, nothing was understood regarding the constructive criticism…!

I'm not a fan of these symmetrical facades, but they certainly have their justification, and if you like them, that's fine. Personally, I would feel comfortable with this floor plan, everything is nice and spacious and bright, including the parents' area. The dressing room is wonderful. I don't have the cardinal directions in mind right now (unfortunately the north arrow is missing on the floor plan!), but would it possibly make sense to mirror the upper floor plan so that you get the relaxation corner and bedroom away from the street and parking lots?

I tried to implement a few things. Is it better now!

I personally like the gable roof better than the hipped roof and 10 times better than the truncated one with the roof terrace. Does the "extension" also get a roof? Maybe also some kind of dormer like a Frisian house?

I’m not really a fan of these symmetrical facades, but they certainly have their justification

First of all, the dose makes the poison also applies to symmetry. Also, the main thing should remain the main thing. It’s disturbing when symmetry is elevated to an alleged cardinal virtue and placed first on the priority list. It may result from it, but it should not be a construction principle. In the present case, symmetry is overdone "only" in the building mass, while strictness has been given higher rank in the facades.

Does the "extension" also get a roof? Maybe also a kind of dormer like a Frisian house?

What do you mean by a "kind of dormer" like on the extension of a Frisian house?

What do you mean by a "kind of dormer" like on the extension of a Frisian house?

Well, this "extension" with a proper roof.