develloper
2016-11-06 14:18:47
- #1
Again OG Attempt 2. Here, the bathroom is a bit bigger and the tub is at the bottom. The fireplace is a problem here, however. By the way, I also find the house really beautiful.
Floor plan design city villa with double garage
- Erstellt am 2016-11-05 14:55:59
ypg
2016-11-06 18:11:49
- #2
So, here is the revision:
I swapped the office and storage room again at the top and enlarged the bathroom.
The kitchen on the ground floor is opened again - on the west side.
The bathroom enlargement does not really suit me. Since the upper floor is made slightly larger above the entrance, the house also becomes more expensive.
And all that just to widen the bathroom, which previously had a width of 2.40 m, a bit. I do not consider 2.40 m a luxury, but okay, and with 11.whatever sqm the bathroom was not small.
Now, however, the roof can be simplified again as a hip roof - which reduces costs again.
The chimney has now also moved into a position that is less complicated. (I don't even know if a fireplace is desired )
We are now just under 200 sqm (without garage).
I find that quite steep, but I oriented myself somewhat between the lines of the client.
Since I have used generous spaces, one could easily save 20/30 cm here and there.
-> Without a fireplace, you can build the whole width of the house one meter smaller, then only the dining area would have to be shifted a bit - the kitchen island with one meter depth can also be smaller.
-> Laundry room with technical equipment I find very spacious. But that was a wish - if the client actually wanted a basement, I assume that with the savings, somewhat more upper floor area is available.
-> Double garage with 8 meters depth is luxury for me too - but we are not working with the Flair 109 budget here, but one or two size classes higher.
If you want to change fundamentals, you should start from zero - for me it was a challenge whether I could combine the landing staircase with the client’s wishes within the given dimensions.
The builder can decide for themselves where and how they want something changed.
A floor-to-ceiling window on the upper floor costs more than one with a parapet, also window fronts over several meters cost more - the art is to achieve a lot with simple means
How big should the house actually be?
I swapped the office and storage room again at the top and enlarged the bathroom.
The kitchen on the ground floor is opened again - on the west side.
The bathroom enlargement does not really suit me. Since the upper floor is made slightly larger above the entrance, the house also becomes more expensive.
And all that just to widen the bathroom, which previously had a width of 2.40 m, a bit. I do not consider 2.40 m a luxury, but okay, and with 11.whatever sqm the bathroom was not small.
Now, however, the roof can be simplified again as a hip roof - which reduces costs again.
The chimney has now also moved into a position that is less complicated. (I don't even know if a fireplace is desired )
We are now just under 200 sqm (without garage).
I find that quite steep, but I oriented myself somewhat between the lines of the client.
Since I have used generous spaces, one could easily save 20/30 cm here and there.
-> Without a fireplace, you can build the whole width of the house one meter smaller, then only the dining area would have to be shifted a bit - the kitchen island with one meter depth can also be smaller.
-> Laundry room with technical equipment I find very spacious. But that was a wish - if the client actually wanted a basement, I assume that with the savings, somewhat more upper floor area is available.
-> Double garage with 8 meters depth is luxury for me too - but we are not working with the Flair 109 budget here, but one or two size classes higher.
If you want to change fundamentals, you should start from zero - for me it was a challenge whether I could combine the landing staircase with the client’s wishes within the given dimensions.
The builder can decide for themselves where and how they want something changed.
A floor-to-ceiling window on the upper floor costs more than one with a parapet, also window fronts over several meters cost more - the art is to achieve a lot with simple means
How big should the house actually be?
tomtom79
2016-11-06 18:15:38
- #3
Arrange the window positions a bit better! Otherwise, a fine floor plan, but I'm curious about the price.
Häuslebau3r
2016-11-06 20:08:32
- #4
I think it’s pretty mediocre, Yvonne, and I bow to you!
sry for the little slang slip
Regarding the roof, of course, it’s again a cost-benefit calculation. The one you’ve now chosen is cheaper and also looks great in combination with the floor plan. Naturally, one could probably continue to use the hipped roof as well.
I personally find the separation in the living area very successful. Here, for example, the fireplace could possibly stand or something similar (an expensive 180-degree stove) or something else. It would also be possible to rotate the living room area by 180 degrees and move the second window further east and then position the stove on the lower south wall. But that goes into further detail.
Regarding the size, the house was planned without a basement (living area only) with about 160-170 m².
If I calculated correctly, the ground floor has just under 78 m². The upper floor with about 85 m² also plays well into this.
The house size naturally should not be larger than necessary and have more square meters than financially possible.
The garage with about 8.00 meters and the possibly desired width is/is unnecessary if not needed of course. However, with a large workbench, the available tools, and the needed small workshop, it becomes necessary. (Of course, if needed, the cars then also have to go outside).
I think it’s awesome that you managed to design the stairwell with such enormous depth like that.
Perhaps some users will also see from the location visible in the picture why the view to the east was valued/wished for.
I tried the living room rotation, and I think it could possibly be done this way depending on the fireplace on the upper floor as well.
sry for the little slang slip
Regarding the roof, of course, it’s again a cost-benefit calculation. The one you’ve now chosen is cheaper and also looks great in combination with the floor plan. Naturally, one could probably continue to use the hipped roof as well.
I personally find the separation in the living area very successful. Here, for example, the fireplace could possibly stand or something similar (an expensive 180-degree stove) or something else. It would also be possible to rotate the living room area by 180 degrees and move the second window further east and then position the stove on the lower south wall. But that goes into further detail.
Regarding the size, the house was planned without a basement (living area only) with about 160-170 m².
If I calculated correctly, the ground floor has just under 78 m². The upper floor with about 85 m² also plays well into this.
The house size naturally should not be larger than necessary and have more square meters than financially possible.
The garage with about 8.00 meters and the possibly desired width is/is unnecessary if not needed of course. However, with a large workbench, the available tools, and the needed small workshop, it becomes necessary. (Of course, if needed, the cars then also have to go outside).
I think it’s awesome that you managed to design the stairwell with such enormous depth like that.
Perhaps some users will also see from the location visible in the picture why the view to the east was valued/wished for.
I tried the living room rotation, and I think it could possibly be done this way depending on the fireplace on the upper floor as well.
ypg
2016-11-06 21:13:19
- #5
I have done the living room rotation, it might be possible to do it like this depending on the fireplace on the upper floor, in my opinion.
I think the placement is nice! But consider where the chimney comes out on the roof and how high it then has to be
Greetings
Legurit
2016-11-06 22:45:58
- #6
The view is beautiful - so why such a "small" window? Why not 4 m floor-to-ceiling?