Whether we expand the stable or build a new house is a difference of 50,000 subsidy, which we do not get with the NEW house....and that's a lot.
In my opinion, that is miscalculated: 50 grand sounds like a lot of money. But first, they quickly dissipate in complications (i.e. I would consider it naive to include them in the budget), and second, they roughly correspond to the price for the square meters above the requirement. I stick to the assessment that for a net no more money (if not even less) there would also be a nice little house with a bedroom not on the windbreak.
We wanted to move away from this plan and in the process the plan we posted here was created, but we are not satisfied with it.
Was that one that included the upper floor?