Very bad and large and shapeless. Replanning tricky - tips

As I said: hypothetically at the level of a 220 sqm bungalow in the same location. And without offsetting the subsidy: the ground just has to be replaced deeper than expected and similar blah blah, the lighter is practically already attached to the seemingly gifted bills. Such a thing is nothing more than a consolation prize for the brave program participants.

Where exactly are the concerns?

Oh yes, just supporting the foundations alone, if more needs to be replaced, would consume the funding.

Would all fire protection measures really be eliminated by removing the room in the upper floor?

We are inquiring here because of the unfavorable planning of the bathroom.

And yes, we are looking for suggestions on how to integrate the support columns into walls. They can still be shifted, but only in the east/west direction, as they support the double T-beam in the ceiling.

That’s the impression I currently have as well, that this project convinces no one here. Our architect fully supports the project but also sees some difficulties in implementing everything.
Our budget is 320,000 with a 10% buffer (which of course should not be touched).
As already mentioned, some craftsmen are in our family who will help, and a lot will be done ourselves.

...and the WC, the storage thing, as well as the questionable bedroom access.

This really only works with absolutely exact measurements.

Well, a sporty plan. I hope the project doesn’t become a bottomless pit. What I don’t understand is: why doesn’t the architect make a better proposal?

...and the WC, the storage thing, as well as the questionable bedroom access.

This really only works with absolutely exact measurements.

Well, a sporty plan. I hope the project doesn’t become a bottomless pit. What I don’t understand is: why doesn’t the architect make a better proposal?

Are they really willing to spend months of their free time on a construction site?

Do you want to maintain this huge roof structure for the next 70/80 years without any benefit? It’s not just about a new roofing.

How old is the barn? Does anyone still know what’s underneath? Everything that was existing stock led to surprises in our case. Costly ones, mind you.
For example, the slurry pit under the manure was not 2 meters deep, but almost 4 meters. It was also much larger than the manure heap. The farm has been on top of it for about 100 years.

You will expose parts of the foundation when you replace the old floor slab. Who knows if the soil underneath is buildable. Maybe more has to go. We had to learn this as well: the state of technology from 1920 is unbuildable in 2017. We had to support the foundations (which didn’t really exist, since it was built on rock) 30 cm deeper than we had to dig downwards. We would have had to excavate 40 cm for the floor slab, but the structural engineer demanded support 70 cm deep.

If barrier-free design in old age is an argument for this construction method, then please also make the floor plan barrier-free.