Of course, a "court usher" will be able to build, as a civil servant he can even find a bank that will finance him up to 100 times his monthly net income.
The only question here is whether it makes sense to go into debt that high, and maybe a few critical remarks can help.
Otherwise, one might eventually discover that the IKEA kitchen no longer quite matches the luxury coffee machine with portafilter, or in the circle of colleagues, wonderful distant trips are talked about, but one's own financing is too tight.....
Criticism is always welcome. However, it is not a one-way street.
If you, for example, "criticize" that one should definitely budget money for a super expensive kitchen, but I say that we do not need a super expensive kitchen, one can accept that as well.
Yes, maybe the IKEA kitchen no longer fits in one's own house. But between an "absolute luxury kitchen that breaks the entire financing" and "IKEA," thankfully there are dozens of alternatives.
And even if the kitchen no longer pleases at some point: don't you think that with the normal half-life of a kitchen, a new one would eventually be due? At least kitchens among all my friends, family, acquaintances... last at least 20 years, mostly even longer. It's really not as if I put in an IKEA kitchen and think two years later that now I definitely need one for 50k+.
By the way, in the circle of colleagues, they are already constantly reporting about distant trips. I am happy for the colleagues and think for myself that I have different priorities. Of course, I would also like to do a round trip through California someday (if it still exists then...). But that's just not in the top 10 on the priority list, but... somewhere down there.