BackSteinGotik
2022-07-14 12:50:50
- #1
I would like to put this into perspective a bit or describe it from my point of view. Here in the forum, it was often said in the past that max. 40% of the household net income
From my point of view, a problem is that many financing plans are completely stretched to the limit and no buffer is built in.
Another problem with existing properties, in my opinion, is the misconception that the renovation can be stretched out bit by bit over years because you want to reduce the financing amount that way. Where is the money supposed to come from, for example for a garage, if everything is already tight? How is the money supposed to be saved?
The problem of the installment up to the (then possible) maximum, over the 40% (which actually only makes sense for really high earners), is surely especially nasty now – if suddenly energy and living costs rise so much that it no longer adds up overall. This applies to both new buildings and existing ones. The latter, often with the neglected modernization, is now becoming a huge problem. The old building is no longer economical to heat, but already at purchase there was no money left for renovation. Where is money supposed to come from when there was no room in the budget to borrow enough money for everything necessary even at almost zero interest rates?