Single-family house - flat roof - forest edge location - 175 sqm

2020-04-02 18:48:16

I see no advantage in the larger frame depth. I would choose the 320 here, the 410 fits less visually (for that, the house would have had to be classically neo-Bauhaus, that is with a flat roof - without overhang - and without accent areas), here the 410 looks too brutal in contrast. The 320/520 looks great, as practically the seal on the outside is already the sash frame. The difference between 520 and 320 is the even more consistent flushness on the inside (only concerning the window/reveal connection, which therefore effectively only pays off with wide bands of coupled elements). I do not know the price (difference) specifically, but the hundredth percent is usually the most expensive when it comes to design.

So far, I only have an offer for the KF 410, which slightly exceeds our budget. The window manufacturer is currently calculating the 320, with the statement that this might be somewhat cheaper. I don’t know much about the frame depths, I just had a gut feeling that a thicker frame is more solid?! Do you see disadvantages with the technology of fully concealed sashes?

We also have another offer, for a Gealan Kubus, which also has this concealed sash but without a cover shell. It is priced the same as the plastic/aluminum one from Internorm.

2020-04-02 19:12:56

As already mentioned, I also find the 320 style more suitable here – it’s not a big deal if that also applies to the price.

I’m not very familiar with the installation depths, it was just a gut feeling that a deeper frame is more solid?! Do you see any disadvantages with the technology of a fully concealed sash?

The larger installation depth here is not a feature, but simply the result of a different construction. I don’t suspect it to be less rigid. No disadvantages, except for the higher price due to the purely visual advantage.

We have another offer for a Gealan Kubus, which also has this concealed sash but without the cover shell. It is priced the same as the plastic/aluminum from Internorm.

And from my point of view, also the same quality class. I like Gealan – also because I find the integrated coloring good instead of the otherwise usual foil coating (and a clever alternative to the cover shell). Take a look at the Kubus and the 320 side by side to see if the edges look equally soft "live" as they do in the catalog picture.

2020-04-03 16:05:03

So far I have only one offer for the KF 410, which slightly exceeds our price range. The window manufacturer is currently quoting the 320, with the statement that this might be somewhat cheaper. I am not very familiar with the installation depths, it was just a gut feeling that a stronger frame is more solid?! Do you see any disadvantages with the technology of a fully concealed sash?

We have another offer, for a Gealan Kubus, which also has this concealed sash but without a cover shell. It is priced the same as the plastic/aluminum from Internorm.

May I ask which sound insulation value was offered to you?

2020-04-03 18:12:30

Have the staircase and the overlap on the upper floor drawn precisely.
Make sure that the door to the dressing room on the bottom of the plan allows at least 70 cm of space.

2020-04-04 15:11:16

May I ask which sound insulation value was offered to you?

The Gealan Kubus was offered with a sound insulation value of 39 dB and the KF 410 with 34 dB. We are still waiting for the offer for the 320 model, but I can provide it as soon as I have it.

2020-04-04 19:33:55

Have the staircase and the overlap in the upper floor precisely drawn.

Not that the door to the dressing room on the bottom of the plan cannot leave at least 70 cm of space.

Hey kbt09. The clear passage dimension is 198.00. This was a big issue during the planning phase. I am aware that DIN requires 2.00.

Similar topics
08.01.2022	Which offer? VEKA V2 vs Softline 82 MD vs Gealan S9000 vs Weru	15

Single-family house - flat roof - forest edge location - 175 sqm

benediktr

11ant

Baufie

kbt09

benediktr

benediktr