11ant
2020-09-22 13:36:33
- #1
145 sqm are absolutely not XS - but a square shape is always a handicap for a floor plan, and the edge length of 950 is, in my opinion, clearly the pain threshold for the floor plan to still work. The house is also not absolutely too small, just relatively so for the differentiation of the floor plan: a study room is already a burden for the allocation of the area here, separating bed and wardrobes is also, and a children's bathroom (which you at least omitted) would be out of the question.
That you received no alternatives is not entirely true: I at least mentioned the models Edition 134 and Evolution 134 from the same provider. And I seem to recall that I had already suggested taking a model with a non-square rectangular floor plan as a basis. By the way, your floor plan is (double swear!) typical for a "town villa," so I nearly fell off my chair that your house provider regularly builds a "country house" version on that basis.
Heating technology is clearly not a layman’s matter; other average citizens rarely have it as a hobby either. Therefore, I found it especially important to point out that if you still need to educate yourself on this anyway, the various options cannot be ranked linearly as better or worse, but each technology is optimal in relation to the targeted energy efficiency level of the house – and also the note that the house provider understands more about this than the customers but does not share his superior knowledge with them without also being guided by his own interests. What calculation might be behind advising you away from the "town villa" with the claim of 30,000 EUR additional costs, I cannot yet speculate. In principle, that is at least a fib, because what makes the "town villa" so affordable is not least its cheap roof. By designing it as a knee wall house instead of a "town villa," a significantly more expensive roof structure is required. The difference is basically structural. The understandable lay logic that knee wall 180 is more expensive than 160, 200 even more expensive than 180, straight wall (= practically knee wall 250) should thus be even more expensive, is a misconception (which providers gladly exploit repeatedly to steer customers with surcharge fears toward the house they want to sell them). You can hardly orient yourself here by either; “solid” calculation is different again. Also, the regional "solid" general contractors preferably offer "town villas" in the economy segment. In reality, the "town villa" cannot be more expensive – on the contrary! – rather, only the provider can make it more expensive in his calculation. That should then only motivate you to look around with other providers!
That is, when you bought the plot, the filling up had simply not yet been done, but was already included in the purchase price?
That you received no alternatives is not entirely true: I at least mentioned the models Edition 134 and Evolution 134 from the same provider. And I seem to recall that I had already suggested taking a model with a non-square rectangular floor plan as a basis. By the way, your floor plan is (double swear!) typical for a "town villa," so I nearly fell off my chair that your house provider regularly builds a "country house" version on that basis.
Heating technology is clearly not a layman’s matter; other average citizens rarely have it as a hobby either. Therefore, I found it especially important to point out that if you still need to educate yourself on this anyway, the various options cannot be ranked linearly as better or worse, but each technology is optimal in relation to the targeted energy efficiency level of the house – and also the note that the house provider understands more about this than the customers but does not share his superior knowledge with them without also being guided by his own interests. What calculation might be behind advising you away from the "town villa" with the claim of 30,000 EUR additional costs, I cannot yet speculate. In principle, that is at least a fib, because what makes the "town villa" so affordable is not least its cheap roof. By designing it as a knee wall house instead of a "town villa," a significantly more expensive roof structure is required. The difference is basically structural. The understandable lay logic that knee wall 180 is more expensive than 160, 200 even more expensive than 180, straight wall (= practically knee wall 250) should thus be even more expensive, is a misconception (which providers gladly exploit repeatedly to steer customers with surcharge fears toward the house they want to sell them). You can hardly orient yourself here by either; “solid” calculation is different again. Also, the regional "solid" general contractors preferably offer "town villas" in the economy segment. In reality, the "town villa" cannot be more expensive – on the contrary! – rather, only the provider can make it more expensive in his calculation. That should then only motivate you to look around with other providers!
Not an option or idea, but that is how we will take over the plot.
That is, when you bought the plot, the filling up had simply not yet been done, but was already included in the purchase price?