KED1234
2022-07-07 22:47:14
- #1
1.5 does not exist. That’s 2 floors.
Okay, good to know. Doesn't it have to be more than 75% from the bottom to count as 2 floors? That wouldn’t be the case here, or do you not count the annex?
You basically pushed everything to the last square meter that is possible. I hope that the floor area ratio II (exceeding the floor area ratio by 50% for ancillary buildings) is not excluded for you?!
Otherwise, it will be too much… I just roughly calculated everything.
Good question, FAR II does not appear in the development plan. I will have to ask the architect again. In general, the neighbors use significantly more space on their plots. So I would be surprised if it doesn’t fit.
Regarding the design
my first impression: I like it. Basically a nice idea, also the slim silhouette… living room at the end, I once planned like this too and found out that with the two entrances to the living room you waste a lot of valuable space.
The wasted space with you could be really useful for the kitchen.
With the light switch, you get a kitchen unit of about 2.60/2.70 m. That will be tight with an eye-level oven and refrigerator. A side-by-side will never be possible. There is hardly any storage space on the unit for somewhat taller items, electrical appliances, or opened beverage bottles. The jam-and-bread cutting board will be centrally located in the house… then it will be placed on the island, which, however, will be too much in the way again. At least for small children and distracted parents.
That would probably be the time to start kitchen planning in more detail. Basically, the plan is to have a kitchen unit on one side of the pantry where most of the electrical appliances will be installed. The unit in the main room is supposed to be relatively "clean". I hadn’t thought so far that the kitchen might become too small. I had already considered reducing the size of the island because I don’t really know what to do with the space. Good wake-up call to dig deeper here. What is the problem if things are placed from the table onto the island? That’s how it is currently and I actually find it quite practical.
Living room: To avoid the problem with the free space in the living room, you would basically have to completely redesign or would you only remove one of the passages? That’s how it was planned in the first draft. But then the living room seemed too closed off to us. I have to say, free space is also a bit of a luxury – I don’t have to use everything (but of course if it is missing elsewhere it’s nonsense).
If you want to combine the utility room with the annex, I would set the door in the annex.
I don’t quite understand what you mean by that. Current plan would be to swap pantry and utility room and make one room out of utility room and HAR without access to the pantry. HAR access remains. HAR is currently at the front because the architect says one can save some connection costs that way (close to the street). I actually quite like that. Do people really use the toilet so often when they have their shoes on?
NW is the big window: with that, you have a pitch-black dining room and kitchen. In summer you get a few rays into the house in the evening.
Only the additional hallway and the living room are on the “chocolate” side of the house. And people tend to spend less time in the living room during summer… so the whole orientation isn’t really that great.
Good point. A bit of light should come from above via the staircase (something still has to be done with the window size here). I had already considered adding more windows at the stairs. The entrance area definitely needs some light too. I don’t like the southeast side yet anyway.
I recently saw a house in a documentary that mainly used north-facing windows. Apparently, it provides particularly even light and is not necessarily too dark.
And I notice about the roof orientation: the ridge direction should lie parallel to the street for you. The neighbors have the orientation as required by the development plan.
The ridge lies parallel to the street as required. The entrance door is on the street side. Is it stated differently somewhere? I know there is no north arrow on the floor plan but the elevations show where what is and the aerial photos are oriented north.
So there is still quite a bit to do.
Nevertheless, I’ll insert my objections in sketch form.
Why would you put the bedroom on the south side? Usually, you want to avoid that and put the children there (as it was before). Together with the ridge direction I have the impression that I didn’t make it quite clear how the house is positioned on the plot. As said, the side with the entrance door lies parallel to the street towards the southeast.
(Toilet quite far from the entrance… that can also backfire ;)… and by the way, you knock over the bottles on the kitchen island… I don’t want to discourage you… but it’s impractical for daily routine.
It is definitely unusual. I urgently have to pay attention to how often the bathroom is used before going out. I actually found the idea quite interesting to put it there and possibly equip it with a skylight.
Edit? The 63e windows are really too narrow… the molding is thicker than the glass.
Yes, I see that now too. Up front, I could also well imagine a large one in the middle to illuminate the staircase. In the back, I would like to replace the two garden windows by one large one (similar to the kitchen).