@all
This hype around wood-look floor tiles has been accompanying me for quite a while now. I admit, I still can’t really understand a decision in favor of wood-look. Partly, this is probably because I’m not a fan of tiles anyway.
Do you have any tutoring for me on why it absolutely "has to" be this kind of "tile" [B]? Expensive, enormous waste, and cold underfoot during transitional periods. If something falls on this floor, it’s not that easy to visually fix this mishap….. oops:
Rhenish greetings
Since we have a little toddler, we definitely wanted something wipeable for the living room and no carpet. Of course, it also had to be suitable for underfloor heating. I wanted tiles, my wife didn’t because she doesn’t like the look of tiles.
While searching for alternatives, I came across wood-look tiles.
My wife could live well with this compromise.
Thanks to underfloor heating, cold feet only occur in the transitional period. On the other hand, you have advantages in winter and summer. In summer it’s even pleasant because the tiles also absorb heat from the room and cool down a bit.
I didn’t find the tiles much more expensive compared to other materials. Parquet, good laminate, good vinyl would not have cost less, maybe even more. Thanks to installation in a random pattern, we had almost no waste.
Regarding mishaps:
Sure, that can be a problem, but you also have similar or other issues with other materials (dents, swelling, etc.).
A big disadvantage, however, is that anything that falls breaks quickly or immediately. The amount of damage our son’s Matchbox cars have suffered in a year is more than what mine suffered throughout my entire childhood.