Single-family house from 1987. Evaluation of the price and the "necessary" work

  • Erstellt am 2022-08-11 15:51:23

SumsumBiene

2022-08-11 18:08:36
  • #1
I would at least have the old windows replaced. I don't know how old you are, but can you still save enough to tackle the other big projects in the next 10 years?
 

Proeter

2022-08-11 18:16:06
  • #2


How would you, for example, carry out the following work while the house is occupied?
- Underfloor heating for heat pump
- New services (electricity, water, sewage)
- Roof insulation
- Remove and replace hazardous materials

Energetically, there is nothing good about an energy certificate with just under 150 kWh/m²a. Tear down and rebuild for €250k? How should that work? That would be more like double. What is small about it? The place has almost 200 m² gross floor area. So €1300/m² for an approximately 80% core renovation is not off the mark. For complete core renovations, around €300k are often estimated here in the forum.
 

SumsumBiene

2022-08-11 18:21:09
  • #3
Well... what one wants and what one must do are two different things. It can all be done if you want. With 200 sqm there is still alternative space available. However, it is less fun.
 

st3lli83

2022-08-11 18:24:54
  • #4
Annoying that I'm on the go right now.. Suboptimal from the phone.

I understood Mapio and found it right away.. The rest can get an idea too...

we are 39 and 35


But you talk as if this is a run-down old building... 80% core renovation!?
And the thing with the pollutant is just a suspicion for now, right?

And how do you get 200 sqm?
Ground floor 70
Attic 48
Basement 56
174 sqm approx. on 3 floors with slopes
 

SaniererNRW123

2022-08-11 18:40:42
  • #5

For the unrenovated year of construction, it is.

I read 120 sqm living area on the ground and upper floors. For €1,300 I then end up at €156,000.

Do you have to do electricity, water, and sewage? Check the lines and then decide. Copper pipes could last another 30-50 years without problems. And electricity depends on one's own wishes, not on a "MUST".
I would also do roof insulation. You can check for hazardous materials beforehand; with that year of construction, no nasty surprises are expected.
Heat pumps also work excellently with suitable radiators. You can have it calculated, and then the matter is settled (I have already done this myself).

We are talking about a still fairly fresh house. Why must one gut renovate? People live in it now and feel comfortable – are they so mistaken or are they just "bums" who are happy to have a roof over their heads? The majority of people in Germany live in such rundown places. Think about that.

Do you need the basement as living space?
 

Proeter

2022-08-11 21:34:58
  • #6

Absolutely not. I am surprised that my words are interpreted so drastically. Other users in other threads would leave even less of older houses than I would :-).
So: a gut renovation means: stripping down to the shell and from there rebuilding the interior and the building services with the goal of achieving a (nearly) like-new condition. Whether the roof is definitely part of the gut renovation is not clearly defined. A gut renovation is by no means a demolition.
By 80% I mean that with your house you don’t have to go all the way back to the shell but could preserve a bit more.

Well, how intensively have you dealt with prefabricated houses so far? Also, a Google search "harmful substances prefabricated houses" is sufficient. In general, prefabricated houses from the 60s to the 80s are problematic. Now your candidate is from the second half of the 80s. At that time, manufacturers were slowly beginning to switch. But that is still no reason for all-clear. Without air analysis, nothing can be done. It is also warned against simply assessing by manufacturer and year of construction, because some manufacturers themselves often don’t know exactly until when stock with harmful substances was still used. Some manufacturers only give the all-clear for construction years from the mid-90s onwards.
I would already be very suspicious if the realtor has not mentioned this fact in the listing. That is an absolute key feature.

I wrote "just under 200" and that was an estimate. The gross floor area includes all living and usable areas (as you correctly stated) and there is only a small deduction for the area under the slanted ceiling. But well, whether 174 or "just under 200" – that does not change my argument.
For a decent gut renovation, in other threads rather €2000/m² is assumed.
 

Similar topics
19.05.2021Experiences with brine heat pump491
18.12.2017Offers for single-family house shell construction and basement received - your assessment?21
11.09.2019Single-family house Bauhaus style living area 180m with double garage53
11.12.2019Gas heating or heat pump air (Mitsubishi?) or groundwater16
05.02.2020Roof insulation from KfW 55 to KfW 40 on the floor of the attic12
15.09.2020New single-family house or core renovation of a house built in 197839
24.03.2025HPS system - picea as a source of electricity and heat?86
07.05.2021Complete renovation of a 150 sqm semi-detached house built in 192539
15.08.2024Recommendation air-water heat pump vs. local near heating network KFW40 new building33
07.01.2025Is a heat pump meter sensible? According to the bill, yes, but is that correct?13
11.02.2025KFW 40, Ground-water heat pump worthwhile or is air-water better?15
07.03.2025L-Bank Z-20 limited residential area with basement20
16.03.2025Heat pump in combination with photovoltaic system15

Oben