Nevertheless, your position remains black and white if you declare gas per se to be quasi asocial.
On the other hand, are senseless electricity consumptions through technology perceived as the current standard included in this consensus?
From permanently heated, oversized living spaces out of pure "luxury", warm feet in the bathroom, warm towels, camera here, automation there, driving children to school, refusing trains/public buses out of convenience, everything imaginable electrified and heated, ........ one could list such things on pages, which are certainly found with you as well.
I currently still drive a current diesel (outside the consensus) but very few kilometers, never fast and often walk anyway. I consume extremely little (except unfortunately too many calories o_O) and repeatedly experience people who define the "right" life by, for example, not having installed gas or driving an electric car. This is then gladly used as a justification for all other dirty deeds that would also be found with them. Oh no, they have declared themselves indisputably good because they have a heat pump or drive an electric car, that's enough to point fingers at others. Sorry but that's just plain!
I keep hearing/reading about "know-it-alls" who themselves live more like a maggot in bacon.
Despite wood stove, gas and diesel, one can have a significantly lower environmental impact than many self-proclaimed model environmentalists.
Therefore, I find your general accusation against a stranger, that installing gas per se is not social, completely off the mark. One should dig a little deeper there..... above all, always start with oneself!