New single-family house 190 sqm (aiming for less sqm!)

  • Erstellt am 2019-03-15 15:40:20

Lucrezia

2019-03-16 20:35:59
  • #1
:D funny summary. The laughter did me good, thanks! Well, the younger dog looks like a little Bigfoot anyway :) Since we have not yet received an invoice from the original architect, so also not paid (the next plan is being drawn up by another architect, as we will no longer build with the original log house company), I want to possibly avoid copyright infringements. Originally, the 2 entrances were next to each other, where the practice entrance is now – which we didn’t particularly like. The corridor was wider, both practice rooms were housed next to each other. Meaning: no possibility to hold courses etc. Too few windows on the south side upstairs. Is it roughly imaginable like this?
 

kbt09

2019-03-16 20:40:50
  • #2
Nope ;) ... it's already hard to get a rough idea with the differently dimensioned floor plans in the original post. But at least the important elements should be correct.
 

Lucrezia

2019-03-16 21:01:16
  • #3
At least the proportions have to be right :) In any case, the result is that we do not want the original plan. Among other things, the private entrance was quite long, which I do not like (my parental home was a typical pump-house of the 70s with a huge marble entrance, all nice but not practical. Now I want exactly the opposite. I have also lived accordingly for the last 25 years – it suits us
 

11ant

2019-03-16 21:31:04
  • #4
Unfortunately not at all. I asked whether the house was developed based on the floor plan or from a building mass vision; and I wanted to be able to imagine which wall stands where the architect said and which you moved. From your words, I gather neither – rather the impression that you probably didn’t just modify but freely reinterpreted quite a bit. Presumably, we would search for the similarities for a long time in a graphical comparison (?)

How is one supposed to imagine the practice operation at all?
 

Lucrezia

2019-03-16 21:44:05
  • #5
So the entire building structure remains unchanged as visible from the exterior view. My design is based 1:1 on this.

After submitting the preliminary building inquiry, the idea arose to make the return slightly wider. The first floor plan was based on this. Afterwards, for the aforementioned reasons, we changed our minds and reduced the return again, as originally planned.

Practice: Therapy, courses such as autogenic training, stress management.
 

11ant

2019-03-16 22:01:57
  • #6

Regionally, I would probably see more of a towing.


So a small group "gymnastics" room?
 

Similar topics
12.08.2013Opinions on the "House on the Slope" floor plan requested31
14.11.2013Our floor plan of 120 sqm on a 469 sqm plot73
29.01.2014City villa floor plan / Feedback on static analysis, arrangement28
08.03.2014Floor plan new construction - Please provide feedback36
17.03.2014Ideas for a floor plan?11
06.08.2014Do you find the floor plan of our city villa okay?46
22.01.2016Once again a floor plan for criticism.34
10.04.2015Cost estimate architect single-family house. Your assessment44
16.06.2015Floor plan 200 sqm with integrated winter garden and gallery32
04.08.2015Floor plan single-family house country house with garage29
27.04.2016Once again a floor plan15
08.08.2016Our floor plan - Your opinion32
19.12.2016Architects' floor plan for a 240m² single-family Bauhaus house35
17.04.2017Civil Engineer vs. Architect17
20.01.2021Bungalow floor plan - What should be considered?164
18.09.2017Semi-detached house - Improvements in the floor plan15
07.02.2021Single-family house, two floor plan variants from the architect39
10.11.2023Floor plan design, 2 full floors, approximately 130-140 sqm without basement192
08.10.20213. Floor plan design new single-family house 220 sqm 2 full floors rooftop terrace61
20.11.2024Floor plan EFH165 sqm first draft - Architect dissatisfied74

Oben