House construction in the Ruhr area on existing land

this is a chestnut - according to the Parks Department it can be removed because it stands right in the middle of the construction site. We'll probably just have to plant a replacement for it.

That surprises me. A replacement tree will never be as good as the existing one. That is basically environmental sacrilege. We had a construction here that had to be built around an oak.

But of course I’m happy for you.
However, I wouldn’t underestimate the highway to the west. It’s quite close. The west wind carries the noise onto your property. But apparently you’re used to that?!
Or is there a noise barrier?

Then just scan the exposé – who knows what can be read from it.

If truly none of the neighbors know from whom they bought the house, they can't all be second owners, can they?
Same house no: as can be seen from the plan drawing, it may extend up to the blue line, which the existing houses do not; within the framework of the floor area ratio and plot ratio, of course, but it's all stated there.

The houses once belonged to Steag and were originally for their own plant employees – at some point Vivawest (a housing company) bought them up. They had almost no precise documents, no exact floor plan, etc. All other houses are rented out (the tenants are all already older and no longer wanted to buy, and their children were not interested in buying, so everything remains rented) my parents were the only ones who accepted the purchase offer, as it was quite a bargain.

Okay, I had understood that the house including the terrace must end at the blue line (but I could be wrong). That would of course be good if the house could be built up to there and only then the terrace comes.

As I said – I don't think anything meaningful can be taken from the exposé. There is almost nothing in it.

That surprises me. A compensatory tree will never be as good as the existing one. That is actually environmental desecration. We discussed a construction here that had to be built around an oak tree.

But I of course grant you that.
However, I would not underestimate the highway to the west. It is quite close. The westerly wind carries the noise onto your property. But you are apparently used to that?!
Or is there a noise barrier?

We were really unsure about the tree as well, but well, we specifically asked. I just hope the lady’s statement is correct.

Yes, the highway is fully expanded and new, better noise barriers are being installed now. I myself have lived there for many years, as I said, and am used to it all. We have never found it disturbing or anything like that.

okay I understood it that the house including the terrace must end at the blue line (but I could be wrong). Of course, it would be good if the house could be built up to that point and then the terrace comes afterward.

In many federal states it is the case that a terrace as an ancillary facility of the house must also be within the building boundaries, yes. And, as mentioned, the floor area ratio must also be observed - a building envelope is therefore not a guaranteed area.

That surprises me. A replacement tree will never be as good as the existing one. That is actually environmental sacrilege. We discussed a construction here that had to be built around an oak tree.

The said tree was protected by a preservation order. I also have a tree on my new property that is at least 40 years old. I tried to plan around it. The inquiry at the municipality/building authority was that if the tree is in the area of the planned building, it can be removed.

Measure the plot dimensions from the 1000 plan in the exposé.

The living area sounds plausible.

7*10*0.8*2=112m2