Climbee
2017-02-10 10:49:31
- #1
Evolith, that's one of those things I always find a bad argument for a new build: "it works." Sure, an 8sqm bathroom works, but couldn’t it be a bit nicer? I would prefer it to be a bit nicer if possible. What was so bad about the ex’s bathroom? It depends on what you make of it. I can only say that back then my girlfriend (we were about 16) got her own little domain in the new build with her own bathroom and a small kitchen. We were all jealous. Of course, she still lived WITH her parents, but when she had visitors (well, teenagers do like to visit each other for communal giggling and the like *g*), the parents had peace and she had her domain. I thought that was great, and if the opportunity exists, why not? Sure, it can be done differently. The question is, does it have to be? What matters is what you personally prefer (for me personally, an 8sqm bathroom would be a no-go as a family bathroom if I were building myself. In an apartment it’s just about manageable, but if I have influence, then no. For you, it’s different). How big a child’s room should be, well, 8sqm is tight in my opinion, but doable. Especially if, as said, the children are mostly in the living room. That wouldn’t work for me either; children can play in the living room occasionally, but then the stuff also has to go back into the child’s room. It’s a matter of attitude. I also believe that children should retreat to their rooms for homework, for example, to be able to concentrate there calmly and without distractions. But I also know many families that do it differently. What’s decisive is this: I think about how it works in my case and adapt the planning accordingly. That’s why I said about playing in the living room: I don’t want to start a debate about it. It wouldn’t work for me, but I know it’s like that in many families. Then you just have to take that into account in the room concept. I just think: if you want to grant your child space (and the original poster obviously wants that and I can understand that well), then the space should be sensibly designed. I also think that for a small child a ballroom of 25sqm is simply way too big and I would also have concerns that fear would come at night, so I would plan so that the room situation can be adapted accordingly as the child grows. If the child then decides, no, I don’t want that much space and I also want to keep using mom and dad’s bathroom, then that’s fine. Then the second room together with the small bathroom also remains the guest area and that’s it!
What I don’t like about the floor plan basically is that, in my opinion, it’s simply a standard floor plan with a few small modifications. The personal situation of the original poster is only half-heartedly taken into account; no innovative or clever ideas, just mainstream. I believe more is possible and a better, more individual plan could offer the original poster more options and freedoms. Sure, for the developer, this kind of individual fuss is a pain because special features cost time and money, even if he charges the builder for it. Still, the most profit comes from the builder taking a standard floor plan from the developer with as few modifications as possible. That goes through smoothly, nothing has to be changed, which makes the team blind. And cost-effective. And that’s the only thing the developer cares about. That’s why you as the builder have to stubbornly push through your ideas (and first get clear about what these are). Personally, I don’t believe that an architect employed by the developer will come up with an individual, very independent design. His boss would step on his toes. The boss is responsible for ensuring that everything stays, as far as possible, within the usual (and practiced) and cost-effective scope.
What I don’t like about the floor plan basically is that, in my opinion, it’s simply a standard floor plan with a few small modifications. The personal situation of the original poster is only half-heartedly taken into account; no innovative or clever ideas, just mainstream. I believe more is possible and a better, more individual plan could offer the original poster more options and freedoms. Sure, for the developer, this kind of individual fuss is a pain because special features cost time and money, even if he charges the builder for it. Still, the most profit comes from the builder taking a standard floor plan from the developer with as few modifications as possible. That goes through smoothly, nothing has to be changed, which makes the team blind. And cost-effective. And that’s the only thing the developer cares about. That’s why you as the builder have to stubbornly push through your ideas (and first get clear about what these are). Personally, I don’t believe that an architect employed by the developer will come up with an individual, very independent design. His boss would step on his toes. The boss is responsible for ensuring that everything stays, as far as possible, within the usual (and practiced) and cost-effective scope.