11ant
2022-05-19 17:42:13
- #1
I see it that the building couple here lacked / was disturbed in / lost the "The-architect-understands-us-feeling," which I consider in any case a good "argument" (in the esoteric sense) to part ways with this planning partner. However, I would then look for another person for that. An amateur planning with the carpenter as a rubber-stamp I do not consider sensible.It may be that the architect has a firm conviction. Or too many clients whom she cannot satisfy. Or or. Or the client is resistant to advice, at least resistant to discussion, or/and could not really say why the things are a "must-have." As a service provider, you face the client, the client stands in front of their wishes, listens to arguments. Personally, I feel the real reason for the separation is missing
A house form dogma definitely has a significant potential to become a burden for the planning success.Furthermore: the basic framework is being adhered to here. Perhaps that is more of a hindrance?