Here you go, your email has arrived and I have looked at the development plan. This was established in 1976 and became legally binding in 1979. At that time, your house was already standing and was therefore incorporated into the plan as an existing structure, which is why the building envelope starts at each house at the street-facing front (plot-specific, since it is not the same but only similar for the neighbors) and extends 14 meters deep from there. For some garages, this means that they would require an exemption if rebuilt in the same location because they are too long. The roof pitch is 48° with a +/- 2° tolerance. The neighboring houses 9 and 11 have individual small shed dormers, apparently the only ones in this section according to the aerial image. I must withdraw my suggestion of the wide shed dormer because requests for exceptions of this extent are apparently not common in this area, and I therefore see little chance for them. Already the "dormer" in the picture of post #51 would, in my opinion, be a precedent in this planning area. At least in this section, no ridge direction is prescribed. Despite no specified heights, I see no worthwhile scope for raising the roof without exceeding the limits of the attic as a non-full storey. I also do not see the desired flat roof extension here as compliant with the plan and with little chance for exemption. In this respect, the expansion of the house in width and continuation of the existing house profile seems to me to be the only possibility. Due to few or no building gaps in the overall "southern part," I also see no reason to consider an amendment to the development plan at least until the area of the allotment garden complex should possibly be permanently built on according to the principle of appropriateness. I therefore see that you will have to significantly reduce the scope of your modernization plans with regard to the house design. Theoretically, you would be "allowed to take revenge" on the facade, at least the development plan would not prevent that.