Joedreck
2021-03-16 20:07:39
- #1
No one mentioned a deep borehole here. Please post a full cost calculation here. That’s the best way to assess economic efficiency.I am not sugarcoating a system that makes sense only in isolated cases, but rather one that represents the most effective solution for me. My actual additional costs are definitely lower than what a ring trench collector would have cost me if I had done it myself, with additionally questionable results in purely gravelly soil.
Following your argument, 99.9% of all homeowners should better not have a wood stove in the living room, because it should only be operated for economic reasons? Then we should also let all firewood, i.e. 99.9% of it, rot in the forest to emit unused CO2? Or should the affected forest owners together with the state now all rely on wood chips with district heating? Or heat completely with wood, even when old? But the main thing is that a deep borehole for 18k, which is then heavily subsidized by the public, can be highly praised.