Legurit
2015-09-16 09:28:34
- #1
I would still redesign the ground floor and try to address the criticism and your own pain points (WC without shower, proper wardrobe, less convoluted utility room, kitchen with usable sit...)zplatz
Single-family house floor plan 150m², plot: 420m²
- Erstellt am 2015-09-15 20:02:11
lastdrop
2015-09-16 09:30:16
- #2
See it as the others do, the kitchen is too small and too impractical with all the doors. Besides, if I were building a house, I wouldn't want to "get by with a small kitchen [not]", but rather make it fit properly.
The same goes for the shower. Even though LEDs are nice, I wouldn't plan a shower that is in the dark.
I like the bay window.
The same goes for the shower. Even though LEDs are nice, I wouldn't plan a shower that is in the dark.
I like the bay window.
djon25
2015-09-16 11:11:45
- #3
I would still redesign the ground floor and try to address the criticism and your own pain points (toilet without shower, proper cloakroom, less convoluted utility room, kitchen with usable sit...)spot
I agree...
If we were satisfied, I wouldn’t ask for ideas/opinions either. So thank you all!
I myself had drawn a similar floor plan, but in my case the kitchen is bigger / + no sliding door
---------------------------
I somehow got mixed up in the post and replaced your attachment with mine; of course, that shouldn’t happen. Please excuse me!
Please upload it again.
Thanks + Rhineland regards
Construction expert
lastdrop
2015-09-16 11:58:43
- #4
A kitchen without a door to the dining/living room would be a no-go for me if small children are or are expected to be around. When you have small children, you spend a certain amount of time in the kitchen, need visual contact and also quick access to the kitchen from the sofa...
But I also don't understand why many people need four seats 3m away from six seats, but that's another matter.
But I also don't understand why many people need four seats 3m away from six seats, but that's another matter.
Bauexperte
2015-09-16 12:04:57
- #5
Hello,
This is probably related to the statements of the development plan. Often, a garage is not allowed to exceed the building window by more than 3.00 m. As your planner drew it, imho; still, I have seen better designs.
I am currently working on a similar plan; however, 9.00 x 12.00 m; also with a north orientation of the plot. Attached you will find, as an example, the ground floor with a canopy at the entrance; this could also easily be designed as a bay window and the rooms behind it included in it. Evenly reduced by about 0.50 m in width, the design should still work - without significant restrictions for the rooms; under the stairs additional storage space for the kitchen could be created. In the corresponding upper floor, the children's rooms are located facing west; the bathroom above the utility room, and even an open space finds room. West for this reason, because the children then get more sun.
Should the building be clad or should the elevations show a wooden facade?
Rhineland regards
Unfortunately, the garage is not allowed to be pushed much further back (that's what the architect told us..)
This is probably related to the statements of the development plan. Often, a garage is not allowed to exceed the building window by more than 3.00 m. As your planner drew it, imho; still, I have seen better designs.
I am currently working on a similar plan; however, 9.00 x 12.00 m; also with a north orientation of the plot. Attached you will find, as an example, the ground floor with a canopy at the entrance; this could also easily be designed as a bay window and the rooms behind it included in it. Evenly reduced by about 0.50 m in width, the design should still work - without significant restrictions for the rooms; under the stairs additional storage space for the kitchen could be created. In the corresponding upper floor, the children's rooms are located facing west; the bathroom above the utility room, and even an open space finds room. West for this reason, because the children then get more sun.
Should the building be clad or should the elevations show a wooden facade?
Rhineland regards
djon25
2015-09-16 12:24:47
- #6
Hello,
That probably has to do with the statements of the development plan. Often a garage is not allowed to exceed the building window by more than 3.00 m. In my opinion, your planner also designed it that way; nevertheless, I have seen better drafts.
I am currently working on a similar plan; however, 9.00 x 12.00 m; also with a north orientation of the property. Attached you will find an example of the ground floor with a cantilevered entrance canopy; however, this could also easily be designed as a bay window and the rooms behind it included in it. Evenly reduced by 0.50 m in width, the design should still work – without significant restrictions for the rooms; under the stairs, additional storage space for the kitchen could be generated. In the corresponding upper floor, the children's rooms face west; the bathroom is above the utility room, even an open space finds a place. West is chosen so that the children get more sun.
Should the building be clad or should the elevations show a wooden façade?
Rhenish regards
Thank you very much for the floor plan. I actually like it quite a bit. Is there still a closet to the right of the stairs or is it in the living room?
The house is to be partially brick-clad.. or rather, it is not yet 100% decided