Setback area RLP for a §34 BauGB boundary development

Unfortunately not, because we have to maintain the 6m distance to the neighbor with the residential building. Then, with the garage on the left and 6m distance on the right, the house becomes only about 7.50m narrow. I don't want such a narrow and long tube there. That's why the garage is on the right. (by the way, that was your first suggestion here from I believe post #5, so in that sense it was also one of your mentioned hints, even if you revised it again a few posts later ;-) )

The change from me came because you only later set the conditions with the southwest and the heights. In my opinion, every design should leave the driveway where it is. Who actually owns the SM at the property boundary? Is your garage bearing it?

The change from me came because you only set the conditions with the software and the heights later. In my opinion, every design should keep the driveway where it is.

By the way, who actually owns the SM at the property boundary? Is your garage bearing it?

No, but that doesn’t work. Look, I measured again. Garage on the left there, with parking spaces for visitors in front of the garage, results in a remaining house width of less than 7m due to the distance to the neighboring building. Moreover, the narrower, the longer, the less of the south garden and the more shaded garden in the afternoon between the two later houses. And a house with the motto "detached semi-detached house" would definitely look really bad. And building such an L-house certainly won’t be easy, especially since I have no idea how we would get our desired floor plan in there, because we want the rooms important to us to face the back instead of the street.

So the garage goes to the right. Meanwhile, I finally talked to a colleague of a friend (he’s a master in a civil engineering company and has a side business), he doesn’t see a problem there and would do it for us. Also the earthworks. If the price is right ^^
But we will probably build the garage somewhat later than the house anyway.

Oh, and the wall on the border to the street is ours. And completely dilapidated. The wall on the border to the neighbor belongs to the neighbor (because it's in the recess of his house wall). Of course, it’s not supposed to support our garage. According to some DIN standard, we have to build the garage on the neighbor's basement foundation anyway (with pad foundations or something). And maybe we (meaning the construction manager) will put 8 L-shaped stones in front of the neighbor’s wall, because nobody knows how stable it still is. We don’t want the driveway to disappear on us someday. But all of that has already been discussed.

Oh, right of course I forgot the attachment :D

And a house like that with the motto "detached semi-detached house" surely looks really shabby.

The neighbor has been doing that for 59 years now - you don't have to copy it down to the stag antlers ;-)

The neighbor has been practicing this for 59 years now - you don’t have to copy it down to the antlers ;-)

:-D (by the way, the other neighbors said that in recent years he only shot at crows and such with his rifle and then it was taken away from him, luckily!! :-D although he is actually quite nice. Just an old grandpa)

but what I actually wanted to say was that our house would then be about 6.5 x 12 or so to fit everything in. His house is much wider than ours could be. And as I said, attaching our house to his is out of the question.