Altai
2021-06-05 06:42:57
- #1
Most people are like that anyway. So dependent on their earned income. If you can’t live off the returns of your assets right now (or you’re retired), you always have to earn a living one way or another. Regardless of whether you rent or buy. That’s why I don’t understand this argument. My ex was like that too, constantly sweating because of a comparatively absolutely ridiculous loan amount (25% of the house value and also low in absolute terms) and he was "broke" for years (unable to make purchases over €1000) because he put every euro into repayment. By now, the loan is repaid and he has realized that he still has to work! Of course, owning a house ties you down geographically more. If there is only one employer in the region where you can work adequately, it is indeed a risk to have a property "hanging around your neck." Otherwise, any trained professional in a reasonably sought-after field should have enough self-confidence to trust themselves to possibly find a new job.In the end, the question was whether to go into debt for over 30 years and always! be dependent on the employer. To give up personal freedom.