Select a building plot - Which one should it be?

The slope limits those who have no imagination or who want a flat area for lawn sports. A gardening enthusiast with imagination appreciates the additional possibilities of multidimensionality.

That is 3 - 4 meters. For a young family, it is neither financially feasible nor fun.

I find it a bit disturbing that the garage is on the right at 28.

Why does a garage in the east (right) bother you? The east sun is nice in the bathroom or bedroom (for waking up), these rooms are usually on the upper floor and thus above the garage. The (north) west has evening sun – so it's nice for rooms where you spend the evening, like the living room...

@11ant what speaks against the proximity to the creek? Insects? Walkers?

In the aerial image I do not see the creek and suspect it as an opening of a forest drainage to the surface, the creek on the left side of the plan also as a bike and walking path.

Do you really have to build such a new-build ghetto with postage stamp lots?

For today’s conditions these are no postage stamp lots, and in my impression an organic extension of a grown new development area in a location typical for the Alb and Steige. I expect the next eastern expansion in thirty years, which will probably be accessed from the other side (otherwise they would not have pulled the lots around the cul-de-sac here either).

Not everyone wants Berlin.

Above all, from a Berlin perspective, too many Prenzlschwaben want Berlin.

Therefore I would personally only build in a 34 area.

I prefer the legal certainty of a development plan. They are not all bad either – only in recent years they were often hastily drafted (due to impending complications in the procedure setup in the future).

There are sociologists who call such new development areas the "ghettos of tomorrow."

Regarding the small cookie-cutter plots full of slab houses instead of villas, I fully agree; in my opinion this is cage housing of mortgage debtors – see

At 28 it bothers me a bit that the garage is on the right.

Remember @Nordlys’ wise words that you only need a garage for the workbench and the Pirelli calendar

These are 3 - 4 meters. Not funny financially or fun-wise for a young family.

Absolutely great for the garden. You can create areas like a shady sandbox (a willow next to the stream should work well as a shade provider, grows fast and costs less than a schnitzel), a paddling pool area (small boxwood or privet hedge around it, grows over the years suitable to the supervision needs), grow herbs and some vegetables together – a slope bed with a few steps is ideal for that (a bit of wood and foil for the terraces stays well under €100), make a small trail (between bushes, wonderfully grows over time, you don’t have to buy much), play a bit with a watercourse (some foil and an old I-beam), plant a colorful meadow with shrubs for wild bees and insects (children can go on a species hunt with a little book and identify insects) – all great things that can be designed visually appealing and exciting for children with very little money. There is still a flat area to play on the cul-de-sac on the street for free.

Absolutely great for the garden. You create areas like a shady sandbox (a willow next to the brook should work well as a shade provider, grows quickly and costs less than a schnitzel), a paddling pool area (small boxwood or privet hedge around it, grows over the years fittingly to the supervision needs), grow herbs and some vegetables together – a sloped bed with a few steps is ideal here (some wood and foil for the steps stays well under €100), make a small trail (between bushes, wonderfully fills in over time, you don't have to buy much), play a bit with a watercourse (some foil and an old H-beam), plant a colorful meadow with bushes for wild bees and insects (children can go on a species hunt with a little booklet and identify insects) – all great things that can be designed visually appealing and exciting for kids with very little money. A flat area to play is still free in the cul-de-sac on the street.

I would do all that. Clearly, that’s then a garden. But let's be honest: that costs more than €100, a lot of work, and the wooden things eventually rot. That happens quickly within 5 years. For a young family, that means time commitment, which is not always available. And more than half of the people willing to build here just want a straight lawn, nothing more. But whatever: Susi has to know that herself. I’m not devaluing the property, just stating facts. And I stick with the 32!

Of course, all of this costs a bit more than €100 - but it’s not a fortune either. For me, the important point was that a beautiful garden doesn’t have to be expensive - even on a slope. Only those who want everything "perfect" from the very first minute, hire garden planners and landscape gardeners, and possibly pave everything over for easier maintenance spend a lot of money.
32 is, for me, roughly equivalent to 33. The latter has the advantage, in my opinion, of having one less neighbor and therefore potentially greater privacy and freedom of design in the garden.