Realistic costs for a single-family house?

The earlier PVC floors were simply great when it came to knives (90s). Even if one got "stuck" in them, you just pulled it out, pressed a bit with your finger, and it was invisible again. Visually, they’re not exactly amazing anymore, but for an office or children’s room, I still think they’re top-notch. Absolutely water-resistant, easy to care for, durable, and great to the touch. Today, they’re partially replaced by cork or vinyl (which is just another term for PVC), but these have other disadvantages. Click vinyl floors are quite robust, and I would always prefer them over laminate and even parquet, but that’s always a matter of taste. Tiles are naturally the most durable, provided you don’t use porcelain stoneware. That can be very sensitive too, and you have to deal with chipped corners. In my opinion, the downside of tiles is the temperature (really cold without underfloor heating) and that they usually last much longer than other floors. Therefore, you should always choose something absolutely timeless here; otherwise, you might be unhappy after 10-15 years. With some craftsmanship skills, you can relatively quickly re-lay click floors yourself, and they only cost about 50% of tiles, so you can change them twice as often. Everyone as they like.

I don't know from which time this recommendation comes. You can do well with it but also really mess up.

You actually can't really call "living spaces" in the basement; the garage takes up about half the space, plus there is the (unheated) technical room and a small (unheated) storage room (technical room according to our plan with a light well, storage room without windows). So the only real "living space" planned is the office/guest room facing the exposed side. Nevertheless, the entire basement is supposed to be tiled, so it probably won't make that much difference then?

Would architectural services be added to your calculation, or are they already included?

What exactly do you mean by additional foundation costs due to the hillside location? Compared to a fully underground basement, the earthworks should be less since you roughly only need to excavate and transport about two-thirds, right?

No, you can't ... OT: I will never understand why "one" is written/spoken, even though the person themselves is meant ...?!

It is a - valid since the beginning of time - rule of merchants: throw the cheapest + the most expensive offer in the trash and deal with the remaining selection. That means nothing other than sorting out "junk" and "luxury"

Of course, if a potential client only obtains *2* offers, they have the short straw. Result-oriented always means having 5 offers available

Rhenish greetings

You know exactly that the statement brings no added value.

That doesn’t help either when someone comes around with old merchant rules. You can try as hard as you want, but you won’t get any reasonable added value from it; rather, you only hamper yourself by clinging to old habits.

Create a reasonable specification of services and choose your supposed partners wisely. And we all know, old rules or additional security always cost money and who ultimately will pay for this is usually beyond question.

And between us, I grew up in trade. If anything really matters there, it’s the principle that trade is change. In other words, those who don’t adapt will be adapted, and you want to force us your old wisdom?