New construction: Connection & cabling Internet + TV

  • Erstellt am 2019-02-15 08:32:49

SenorRaul7

2019-02-21 09:05:18
  • #1

Thank you very much! The advantages would therefore be that I can completely do without coaxial wiring. An extra server/converter in the utility room would then not be necessary, because it is essentially mounted directly on the dish. The disadvantage is that at the moment no TV can process this signal yet. The set-top box I will receive from Deutsche Glasfaser will also only be designed for IPTV. So I would STILL have to get a receiver, preferably one that can do everything. And that also for all rooms where there might possibly be a TV in the future. Difficult decision... maybe the normal satellite cables are still more sensible after all...
 

empyresystems

2019-02-21 09:11:38
  • #2
I was mistaken... Have a look at the latest Panasonic models. They are probably the first to have an integrated TV-IP server/client.
 

SenorRaul7

2019-02-21 09:19:10
  • #3
Okay, but I understand correctly that the IPTV set-top box from Deutsche Glasfaser will not help me with SAT over IP, right? Both signals do come in via the LAN cable, but this receiver can only process the IPTV signal. I do not know the exact designation of the DG receiver, on the homepage you can only see the brand "amino" in the picture.
 

empyresystems

2019-02-21 09:25:19
  • #4
It is probably like that. However, I cannot answer you with certainty because I do not know the boxes. Possibly, Deutsche Glasfaser has branded the device and/or restricted its functionality so that it can only be used with their own offer. I personally would do without IPTV and choose the option with SAT over IP in the local network. One-time acquisition costs, no contractual obligation, best SAT signal in the local network, and still independent of your internet connection. For me personally, the most modern and best way to receive television...
 

empyresystems

2019-02-21 09:28:29
  • #5
It combines the best of both worlds, so to speak. SAT still offers the greatest variety of channels and (in my opinion) the best signal. In addition, distribution in the local network is all via IP. Saves additional coaxial cabling, is independent of the provider, and is available on all devices.
 

Mycraft

2019-02-21 09:29:32
  • #6


Sure,

it's the simplest, fastest, most stable and cost-effective option. I wouldn't think twice.

And if SAT-IP is outgrown one day, you can always retrofit it.
 

Similar topics
18.10.2013SAT and/or cable?12
12.12.2015Antenna connection forgotten (SAT system)26
17.01.2021Installation of a satellite system38
02.06.2016Conduit Costs - Network, SAT, Backup14
25.08.2016IpTV and alternatives...34
04.01.2017House wiring LAN/SAT62
30.04.2017Telephone connection / LAN wiring25
05.04.2017LAN / SAT wiring in single-family house52
05.04.2018Feedback Electrical Planning New Construction21
01.05.2018Is satellite television still relevant?46
25.08.2020Is a satellite system still necessary in new buildings, or is IPTV sufficient?233
09.04.2020What type of television connection are you planning in the new single-family house?37
03.06.2020TV / SAT-TV / Over the network or distributor and via cable in the new building?14
08.04.2021Building without antenna and SAT-CAT cable without conduit?65
26.01.2021Reasonably changing existing SAT/cable connection botch work27
14.05.2021FTTH/Network/DECT/IPTV is it correct?27
04.01.2022Cable vs. Telecom Fiber Optic - Decision56
10.01.2023Which router for our new building?146
22.11.2024DSL vs. Fiber Optic Experiences?27

Oben