BobRoss
2024-02-19 20:20:19
- #1
"Robust" against misplanning?
Robust against high consumption certainly not.
Correct, robust against misplanning. I mentioned that a buffer tank does not increase efficiency.
"On the one hand", but where is the "on the other hand"?
And the "on the one hand" is really quite irrelevant.
That is indeed an important aspect: the heat pump must also be able to get rid of its heat during operation. At low flow temperature and a small flow/return temperature difference, the system must be designed for a volume flow adjusted to the heat pump model. All of this is feasible, but if the commissioned heating installer does not put in the effort, the bufferless system may not function as reliably in the worst case. This is the only point I wanted to make.
1000l is of course already extreme. Additionally, many heat pumps are only half as efficient at 45 degrees as at 35 degrees.
Now one can say that this naturally reduces cycling even better.
However, whether one wants to do this with double the electricity consumption I consider very questionable.
My example was obviously formulated in a misleading way. It was not about the specific temperatures in the example, but rather a somewhat illustrative example of the thermal energy needed to raise the temperature of 1000L of water by 10 degrees. Perhaps there was too little context. I think a further discussion on this point does not help here.
For a bufferless system, it would be important to me that the heat pump is modulating and under no circumstances also oversized at the same time. From my point of view, it can even be a size smaller than in the calculation, as long as it is still sufficient for hot water preparation (depends on the system).
In the usual heating demand calculation based on component values, no solar gains are accounted for, no heat emission from people and appliances in the house is considered, and the building time constant is not taken into account—that is, the heat storage capacity of the materials used in the house (solid construction, etc.).
And one must not forget that the calculation considers the stress-test case. In the worst case of noticeable undersizing, the house is not cold all year round but perhaps just a bit cooler in the living room for a few days every five years.
I took the trouble to calculate this as precisely as possible for a house with 475m²—I arrived at 9kW = sufficient sizing. 12kW were installed because the heating installer refused to install the smaller model. The actual annual values are very close to the values calculated back then and suggest that 9kW would have sufficed.