Improvement suggestions single-family house 137 sqm GF with granny flat

Hi

Then clarify such things first before you start working on a draft/implementing one that doesn’t fit.
When the base data is certain, you announce it again and then there will also be constructive suggestions.

Olli

preferably

Is not binding.
Take for example 1.40 with 35 degrees or so, then you have more freedoms.
But that develops along with the floor area.
I would for example move the guest upstairs into a spare room, (next to the empty suitcases )
So: storage on the ground floor is already great, then the mother-in-law can get some of it. Then she doesn’t have to use the stairs to the DB.
May I ask what the symbols in the bathrooms mean?

I summarize: the property is free from developers, but apparently it is being sold by a (intertwined with the municipality ?) development agency, and they want to know at the point of sale how one intends to build (?); their uniformity idea originated from the 115 cm knee wall.

Actually, I was roughly satisfied with the floor plan and only wanted tips for or against a construction company

In the end, you will hopefully be glad that you are not being led into this trap here. A construction company will usually not send a co-contractor away empty-handed if they see a chance for an approval stamp - and unfortunately that chance would be given: the building authority would not care about the overtime for your hand-carved interior wall corners; they would give every formally compliant nonsense their checkmark. Decided and announced, the client may be unhappy; and the construction company will put a price on it. Then the bank says the price fits your creditworthiness, and you unlucky one would initially even be pleased. Because neither construction companies nor building authorities employ counselors who would avert such fates. And afterwards, someone stands in their finished botched building and can’t believe that experts did not warn them. But that is not their job. The contractor also has mouths of their family to feed; and the approval officer feels citizen-friendly by not opposing a building wish that challenges their head-shaking if the implementation is approvable. Have we at least been able to shake your satisfaction now (so that you also understand why) ?

If the base data are certain, you communicate them again

As I understand it, the development plan clearly states that the framework is larger; but the seller can still decide on someone else if one exploits the permitted framework instead of the more favorable little witch’s house for him. However, I also consider the latter something that should not be dismissed lightly even with a more clever design. The apparent contradiction at first glance between one-and-a-half and two stories probably lies in the peculiarity of the full story according to Berlin-Brandenburg.

First of all, I would like to briefly thank you, I find it more than astonishing how much time you take for my concern.

It is not binding.
Take for example 1.40 with 35 degrees or so, then you have more freedoms.
But that develops with the base area.
I would, for example, relocate the guest upstairs into a reserve room (next to the empty suitcases )
So: storage on the ground floor is already great, so the mother-in-law can use some of it. Then she also doesn’t have to use the stairs to the DB.
May I ask what the symbols in the bathrooms mean?

Yes, I see it similarly with the stairs to the attic, the mother-in-law is not getting any younger either.. who knows how long she can still go up there without problems.

I’ll summarize: the plot is free of developers, but apparently is being sold by a development company (entwined with the municipality?), and they want to know at the time of sale how one intends to develop (?); their uniformity idea gave rise to the 115 cm knee wall.


In the end, hopefully you are glad that no one lets you walk into this trap here. A construction company will usually not send a co-client home empty-handed if they see a chance for a permit stamp - and that chance would unfortunately be given: the building authority wouldn’t care about overtime for your hand-carved interior wall corners, there they would tick every formally compliant nonsense. Decided and announced, the builder may be unhappy; and the construction company will put a price on it. Then the bank says the price fits your credit rating, and you unlucky one would even be pleased for the moment. Because neither construction companies nor building authorities employ counselors who would avert such fates. And afterwards someone stands in their finished botched house and can’t believe that experts didn’t warn them. But that is not their job at all. The building contractor also has mouths in his family to feed; and the permit officer feels citizen-friendly enough not to oppose even a building wish that causes him to shake his head if the execution is permit-worthy. Have we at least been able to shake your satisfaction now (so that you can understand why)?

As I understand it, the development plan clearly says that the framework is larger; but the seller can still decide for someone else if you exhaust the allowed framework more instead of the more convenient little witch’s house for them. The latter, however, I consider something that shouldn’t be dismissed lightly even with more clever planning. The apparent contradiction between one-and-a-half and two floors at first glance probably lies in the peculiarity of the full floor in Berlin-Brandenburg.

Exactly, the land seller belongs to the city and they require this knee wall. The submitted plans will be taken with the purchase contract.

Where did you get this draftsman from? I can hardly believe that he seriously studied architecture. With your fairly high standards, I would definitely not skimp on a competent professional who truly deserves the title of architect.

Please do not give any further answers and then say, I already told you that. Summarize, and then we can work with just a few corrections if you like. This won't do.