Improvement suggestions single-family house 137 sqm GF with granny flat

Nevertheless, pulling suggestions out of a hat would habitually come from you – but I suspect that the highly compressed wish-framework imbalance is also stifling your creativity here

That is exactly why I asked for a fresh start with concrete and complete information. So far, I do not see it...

A try with attic roof expansion (50°) approximately according to the wishes of the builders, which I consider very questionable. (Stairs as always no landings)



[ATTACH alt="Zweifamilienhaus-OG.jpg" type="full"]44362[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH alt="Zweifamilienhaus-DG.jpg" type="full"]44358[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH alt="Zweifamilienhaus-A.jpg" type="full"]44357[/ATTACH]

Dear, that you still dare to try – unfortunately, I fear that rooms in the attic in Berlin / Brandenburg would be considered as a three-story building (?) – I say again "call 4 "

unfortunately I fear that rooms in the attic in Berlin / Brandenburg would be considered as a three-story building (?) - I’ll say again "call 4 "

Oh really? Well, the Prussians ...

I say again "call 4 @Escroda"

64 posts on 11 pages. Can someone brief me, name the decisive post numbers and formulate the exact question?

Gladly: Floor plans in #11, location sketch in #21/32, development plan mentioned in #34, the property is located there in WA19, the property seller requests knee wall 115. The question is on the one hand the maximum building volume and on the other hand whether Katja's proposal with the children's rooms in the attic would fail because this would then be a third floor.