Am I willing to live in rent at the bank for decades (for most 25 to 35 years) and therefore give up freedom, vacation, and the good feeling of owing nothing to anyone?
This question is very good and has nothing to do with fear.
The term "freedom" is especially close to me. Freedom begins in one’s own mind. Regarding "living," owning a house does not make me more or less free than renting one. The money goes one way or the other, and I can change the condition and location if I want.
The "good feeling of giving something up"—I am still practicing that and smile at my self-deception in my attempts. The engagement with renunciation has many good aspects.
The "good feeling of owing nothing to anyone" is an interesting category. I approach this more holistically: I think that as a social being, a person needs a form of interdependence so that society and peace can function long-term. The goal of functioning as an unbound, self-sufficient unit may be individually desirable at first, but socially it is questionable. People always need help. This includes the qualities of being able to give as well as to receive. Whoever gives without being able to receive creates an imbalance. Entering into obligations with each other is social glue.
Unfortunately, in reality, you can’t just sell your house like that. It’s like with a new car: driven one kilometer and it’s only worth half because it’s used. Somewhat exaggerated, but with a house it is similar. The ancillary purchase costs are definitely gone. And the bank will, if necessary, also want its prepayment penalty.
That may be so, but it doesn’t have to be. We are currently selling our townhouse with a good 100% markup over the total construction costs from 2001. Could have gone worse. You might lose some money. So what? That’s just how it is when you realign your life. Imagine how many people it goes like this when they separate? All doable.
Only not having money and not being able to meet obligations is a tyrant. Everything else you can decide either way. Money comes and goes. Quality of life and time do not. This thought greatly simplifies setting priorities.
In the end, building a house is just building a house and not something a person must do or refrain from doing. For some, it is the fulfillment of a great inner need; for others, a pragmatic cost/benefit consideration. Others avoid it because they don’t want to tie themselves to property and loans.