What I wanted to express was that regular investments in the home are necessary to maintain its value. If you just live it down, in the end you have a property that is worth correspondingly less. So you can't stubbornly calculate and say: I pay x interest to the bank and y repayment. After 30 years, I will have saved the fictitious selling price. If you don't invest anything during that period, you are just living the house down. Or you invest, but then that has to be factored into the calculation. Reserves are often mentioned here. These were not considered in the previous calculations. That reduces the advantage compared to the tenant accordingly. And a lot goes into it. Here a bit in the garden, there a new motor for the garage door. Sure, the tenant probably doesn't have a garden and no electric gate. The living value is also, in my opinion, different. But the owner also pays many things on the side. A realistic calculation is difficult there. And I still claim: the smart person rents and rents out property.