Uh, hold on a second, I have to work hard for my money,
I never said otherwise. But it just seems that you get quite a bit more salary than others here. [[[[[And the rest of us also work hard, we probably just have a different job or a more tangible salary. Whether someone works hard or harder, I’m not going to judge here – and it’s not possible anyway. But “working hard” or “soft...” is not rewarded accordingly (just look at nursing, for example). In that respect, you’re probably paid above average for less hard work ]]]]]
I put that in brackets because it is off topic.
Everyone should spend their money, no matter how they got it legally, on whatever they want. That’s their business. And it’s also up to each person how much percentage they save or don’t or spend on rent or a house.
That applies to you just as it does to Steffen or Yosan or me.
But it’s just ridiculous when someone comes here and thinks they have to have 20... 60... or 100,000 stashed away. That puts them at the center of the discussion without having understood the thread. The number says nothing.
Net salaries are comprehensible and logical. Everything else is not.
And not even that says anything, as you can see from some: if you count your “stash” annually and then put half of it back into financing, what remains of the “stash”? Or imagine someone takes all their savings at the end of the year and puts them into financing. Does that mean they have no stash? That means 0, and that’s the goal...
Everyone has a surplus somewhere: one 5%, another 50%. At 50%, the probability is higher that more money is fed back into the economy. End of story.
Someone here mentioned a dick-measuring contest – and he’s right. This thread is worse than the car thread.