Kreisrund
2021-11-27 10:29:32
- #1
You write that the windbreak is absolutely necessary. May I ask why?
Not at all. For not forcing the, in my opinion, superfluous captain's gable into the center at least, I even give half a plus point!The missing symmetry is not a big problem now, do facades have to be completely symmetrical?
In the obligation table, it is only listed as "should".You write that the windbreak is absolutely necessary.
Sure, you may ask anything, otherwise I wouldn’t be here.
You write that the windbreak is absolutely necessary. May I ask why?
Yes, of course. We had such window seats on vacation and simply love reading there.
Honestly: window seats as a wish?
Well, not totally arbitrary. And I post that here precisely for small inconsistencies. We have already corrected it. Thanks for the hint.
Doors are also placed arbitrarily: personally, the living room door would bother me, which is not aligned with the stairs, or also the planned offset of the floor covering in the living area.
But that’s purely a matter of opinion, isn’t it? No one looks at the gable except us and the forest animals. I actually find it quite nice. Regarding the windows, we have already managed to make it more uniform, we have to talk to the architect to see if everything is feasible.
The house gets a visual imbalance.
Usually the wish goes hand in hand with forgoing the basement or including the basement in the living space.
We don’t iron and everything else goes in the dryer anyway.
You want to have the washing machines where the laundry is generated. I would want the washing machines where I can hang up and fold laundry. Maybe even iron. And where I can have laundry baskets standing. Not in a children’s bathroom for three kids.
Well, the alternatives are: technology + 1 small storage room for 53,000 or technology + 2 larger storage rooms for 66,000. Or completely different room layouts and zones, none of which have really convinced us so far. For a long time we had a version in which we included the attic and the basement. But we were not happy with that. Not with the paths and not with the room layouts.
Otherwise a technology room and a hobby room for 70,000 plus are being built here. Respect. If you like to pay that?!
Hmm, I don’t understand the approach. We crossed out a few “wanted things,” sure – the granny flat for example. But the requirements were not randomly made up or created by looking at model house catalogs playing wishful thinking. I have a target image with certain features that I want to work towards. If I can have the “why” differently, then a change is no problem. But if the change is generally more effective/better but no longer fulfills the things important to me, then that’s no use to me.
Your must-haves at the very beginning: has anything developed for you during the planning phase? Have you worked on your early ideas while the planning offered something different? Or was a fixed thread and list worked through statically – regardless of whether it fits or not?!
Definitely plan the furnishing because of the slant before a design is approved.
This is the current draft. Around the window seat there should be a bookshelf wall
And the rest of the room? Just show how you furnish the entire open space. Or: draw it for YOURSELF.
Installation wall for TV and such. We haven’t finalized the length yet, I’d like to make it shorter.
What kind of knee wall is that between living and kitchen/dining?
I agree too. But that’s still a discussion point here.
In the living room there is a dead corner between sofa back and wall with door from the hallway
Correct. The kitchen will get a sliding door. There was tough discussion about access to the office or guest WC through the foyer to minimize the number of doors in the hallway. But the disadvantages outweigh too much.
Quite a labyrinth of doors on the ground floor – I count eight door openings/passages?
Yeah, it’s the best iteration we had so far and you can hang the towel radiator there. I don’t even dare to post the others. In the model house park we had a bathroom very similar to this, which we already found nice.
The slanted wall in the office/bathroom is impractical.
I work almost exclusively remote, my wife needs a workplace at home and has her sewing hobby. The large room is then also the guest room (hence also a shower bathroom there).
Why almost 20 sqm for two workspaces?
Probably a wrong label from the architect, should be called hallway.
What does “gallery” mean on the upper floor?
After all, we have been working on the floor plan for a year now.
I basically work only remotely, my wife needs a workplace at home and has her sewing hobby. The large room is then also at the same time a guest room (that’s why there is a shower bathroom there).
I find your general feedback good in order to reflect our thoughts on the individual things again.
We see the large bathroom as a family bathroom, the toilet on the upper floor not as a children’s bathroom, but as an alternative toilet and for washing and such. The shower on the ground floor is for guests and for me during home office.
But that is now purely a matter of opinion, isn’t it?
Hmm, I don’t understand that approach. We have scratched a few "desired things," sure - for example, the granny flat. But the requirements were not randomly chosen or created because we looked at model house catalogs and played wishful thinking. I do have a target concept with certain characteristics that I want to work towards.
A bookshelves wall is supposed to be placed all around the window seat.
In our current house, our entrance looks like this: