blubbernase
2021-12-01 02:18:06
- #1
Thanks for the food for thought.
We actually already had your suggestion and an alternative once before, there was even a first sketch draft - back then we included the attic (parents + office all the way up, kids on the upper floor, ground floor as suggested and with HTR and therefore no basement.) After many discussions and visualizations, we discarded it again.
Unfortunately, your assumptions are not entirely correct. But I understand your basic argument. In fact, "Pinterest" has very little to do with our approach. Of course, we also received the list of "Pinterest wishes" commonly suggested when building and then discarded it again.
Well, and here I can simply say clearly for us that we were not inspired by an Ikea catalog, but rather spent a long time reflecting on our current life. For example, a piano clearly belongs in the living-dining area for us. Retreat spaces should be the individual rooms – there are plenty of them, one for each person. This is how we live and love it today – so why should we change that now? We love our book collection, after all we have hundreds of them. They should be visible.
Many of the tips and hints from the pages here we have considered and also implemented directly. Your list here, for example, very good advice.
That our basic concept doesn’t fit many is okay, it has to fit us. Example with the stairs: A staircase in the entrance area is an absolute no-go for us – yet 90% of all floor plans are like that and many like it. Or the open entrance area from which you can basically see the entire ground floor – no thanks! Floor-to-ceiling windows: we don’t have them, find them impractical and not nice.
As I said, I understand where all this comes from – but so far not a single point in this thread has convinced me that something about the basic layout has to be changed, and not because of "I don’t know it, I don’t want it" but because these points have already been discussed with us and we came to a different conclusion. Of course, we have changed parts.
We will now approach the facade image again. I will then post it here again.
We actually already had your suggestion and an alternative once before, there was even a first sketch draft - back then we included the attic (parents + office all the way up, kids on the upper floor, ground floor as suggested and with HTR and therefore no basement.) After many discussions and visualizations, we discarded it again.
Unfortunately, your assumptions are not entirely correct. But I understand your basic argument. In fact, "Pinterest" has very little to do with our approach. Of course, we also received the list of "Pinterest wishes" commonly suggested when building and then discarded it again.
And that brings us to the topic: what kind of house do you actually want? Like Pinterest, which mostly shows staged rooms (all advertising for living better or Ikea) or for yourself as an individual family?!
Well, and here I can simply say clearly for us that we were not inspired by an Ikea catalog, but rather spent a long time reflecting on our current life. For example, a piano clearly belongs in the living-dining area for us. Retreat spaces should be the individual rooms – there are plenty of them, one for each person. This is how we live and love it today – so why should we change that now? We love our book collection, after all we have hundreds of them. They should be visible.
Many of the tips and hints from the pages here we have considered and also implemented directly. Your list here, for example, very good advice.
That our basic concept doesn’t fit many is okay, it has to fit us. Example with the stairs: A staircase in the entrance area is an absolute no-go for us – yet 90% of all floor plans are like that and many like it. Or the open entrance area from which you can basically see the entire ground floor – no thanks! Floor-to-ceiling windows: we don’t have them, find them impractical and not nice.
I just don’t understand why that should exclude each other. Why shouldn’t I simply implement what brings me joy today optimized. And of course, you’re euphoric about it, maybe I’m just not so good at conveying that.
Is there an euphoria to finally implement the big dream or does one just want to take their mini-rooms and what they know, their rented average, 500 km to the necessary move?
As I said, I understand where all this comes from – but so far not a single point in this thread has convinced me that something about the basic layout has to be changed, and not because of "I don’t know it, I don’t want it" but because these points have already been discussed with us and we came to a different conclusion. Of course, we have changed parts.
We will now approach the facade image again. I will then post it here again.