Basically, it doesn't look bad, but the assigned proportions seem unfinished to me. The open space of 47 sqm is not exactly huge but sufficient. In contrast, I see overly generous children's rooms, a difficult-to-furnish dressing room where you can't really dress. I had already asked once, unfortunately without an answer, whether all furniture in the house, including the respective intermediate walls/passages, are provided with actual measurements, as I see some tight spots there. The lower hallway has 18!! sqm, the guest room almost 16 sqm, which will probably be a home office. The technology could be sufficient, there is no utility room, and the usability of the narrow storage room (dimensions?) is not clear to me. The absence of a second shower in a family of four, given this need, would be considered a blatant design flaw in the year 2020; I am absolutely sure that this will be regretted in a few years, especially by the children, especially since it would be possible to at least prepare this; not to mention a possible resale value. The shower on the upper floor blocks the room like a block; I would look for another solution there. All in all, I stick to the fact that the proportions are not right; often you want to give children particularly large rooms, which does not necessarily affect their well-being and is expensive or means space is missing elsewhere. The hint from about a basement seems very sensible to me, although I am not a basement type. But that could make many things more appropriate. As I said, actual measurements, especially of furniture, would be important; I currently see the open space as very tight for the dining table/living area.