By the way, I don’t understand quite a few things: 78.08 sqm attic is 85.32% of 91.51 sqm on the ground floor – that would mathematically be a second full floor. In the cross-section, the nominal ridge height is already slightly exceeded – so what is the reference height? Then you talk about 80 cm by which the house should be higher, which I cannot find in the cross-section nor does it answer my question of how you want to save the basement with that: that would be both an almost ideal base height for a basement without much light well digging, and a basement waiver would mean, according to my formula, 40% basement cost. So my impression cannot be that this is a detail-level imperfection. I rather see the homework still far from being done.
Again on the process so far:
1. Originally requested was a single-family house 1.5 (approx. 130 sqm living area) with basement and double garage. Personal meetings with Contractor 1 and Contractor 2 took place, building regulations etc. were obtained. Contractor 1 recommended to build a gas condensing device with solar thermal and without KFW 55, but optionally offered air-water heat pump with KFW 55. Contractor 2 discouraged me from the recommendation of Contractor 1 and offered only air-water heat pump with ventilation system (KFW 55). Contractor 1 was cheaper compared to Contractor 2. Floor plans (10.5 x 8.5 m) from Contractor 1 and Contractor 2 are attached.
2. Due to the average flood level, a waterproof concrete shell ("white tub") is necessary, and the house protrudes about 70-80 cm relative to the street. Entrance stairs are required, terrace sloping, knee wall 125 cm, rooms in the attic are in my opinion all too small, attic storage is unusable (well, there would be enough space in the basement).
My initial thinking: building the house without a basement is cheaper, less excavation, rooms become bigger, entrance stairs are omitted, more space in the attic storage, knee wall becomes higher? Think again! I sent my self-created beginner floor plans to Contractor 1 and he implemented it 1:1 without optimization. New offer from Contractor 1 was as expensive as with basement. Reason: house is now "much" bigger (12 x 9.8 m). "Details will be clarified in the working planning." To my dissatisfaction, the knee wall suddenly was 90 cm, which was justified by the plot ratio/floor space ratio and the 75% regulation.
3. Now I have taken the floor planning into my own hands or rather tried to. That’s how I came across this forum in the hope to get valuable advice and many eyes obviously see more than just two. So far you have really helped me a lot. Thank you very much for your valuable time! Maybe I should start again from scratch, look for a new contractor or architect and reconsider a basement again.
These are real dimensions of the furniture, which this online tool provides me. However, I only inserted the furniture as an "example," since I haven’t yet really thought about the future furnishing but only used the dimensions of our current living room and kitchen as a "reference." The large hallway on the ground floor still needs a lot of optimization, but I currently don’t know how to rearrange the rooms. The "narrow" storage room on the ground floor (posting #10) is 3.18 x 1.25 m. The dressing room also gives me headaches. Construct differently or leave it out entirely? My wife absolutely wants a large walk-in shower. The roof slope really doesn’t make it easy for me.
The bikes should only go in there during winter. Or on the wall in the garage, although a single garage without storage room is too tight. I will think about a single garage with storage room.
A door in the recess unfortunately also takes up space. I find large children’s rooms more important than a huge master bedroom. Since I only use the upper floor for sleeping, I gladly give up the square meters. I’ll reconsider the issue with the shower and moving the window in the guest room. Thanks to you!
I have taken your notes on the pantry and the distances into account in the current plan (posting #10). Thanks!
