11ant
2021-09-23 11:44:09
- #1
I cannot leave it at that. Why would house providers shoot themselves in the foot by creating impractical floor plans? – after all, they want to create high-volume basic models to which as many customers as possible only make changes at the selection stage and only a few customers make constructive changes, and even then only in detail or in a simple form, such as shifting walls by one grid step. This assessment can therefore, in my opinion, only stem from the fact that they build for a majority taste, and the more forward-thinking builder then sees planning deficits in it. Most customers understand a household room as a utility connection room, which can also house washing machine and dryer and where you only put down the ironing board. If someone also wants to do sewing work there, of course it is too small. Real home offices hardly existed before Corona; rather, the salary sacrifice "company car" driver was content, just to show off (to visitors and on the tax return), to grandly call his briefcase storage room a "study." The real piles of clothes are thrown in there, the official "cloakroom" is just a tidy backdrop for three guest jackets and a bowl for the car keys. The same applies to the "dressing room": most customers simply mean a floor-to-ceiling screen between bed and wardrobe. You can best live off educated elites in the luxury segment; normal providers need volume.The floor plans of prefab house manufacturers have exactly 3 problems: - a much too small utility room - virtually no cloakroom - often no cabinets in the dressing room