Floor plan - 135 sqm, 1.5 storeys, gable roof

  • Erstellt am 2019-02-18 21:20:31

kaho674

2019-02-24 18:06:31
  • #1

Oh really?


Yes, if you have already signed, just take a look at the contract! What does it say there? If nothing exact is stated, in my opinion the DIN standard for living area calculation applies. Therefore the floor area on the ground floor would be larger, since upstairs the sloped ceilings are not fully or at all included in the calculation.
 

ypg

2019-02-24 18:48:08
  • #2


Fine!
After 15 pages (on every page you are asked what the measurements are),
Comes a "correct."

I looked at your BT plan again: 31cm thick (narrow) exterior walls are being installed... just for your information... I actually thought that nothing less than 36 is possible anymore, even with timber frame construction...
Well, just a note.
Otherwise, I'll wait and see what comes next.
 

kbt09

2019-02-24 19:02:17
  • #3


Net floor area is NOT the exterior dimensions (yours are 10.05x8.2=80.6 sqm and that is different from 67.75 sqm)

Difference between net floor area and living area:
Net floor area also includes areas with less than 1 m standing height or areas where shafts have to be installed. Those do not count as living area.

And, I don’t think you have a contract with a property developer. A property developer sells land and finished house together.

Do you have to go for 1.5 stories? A single level with a gable roof works too – right?
 

Niloa

2019-02-24 19:03:17
  • #4
It can't be that you get a single-story house (with knee wall) for the price of a two-story city villa, with the same footprint of the house? At least that's how I understood it in all the discussions?
 

kbt09

2019-02-24 19:14:20
  • #5
So, if the net floor area is really agreed upon for the house contract, then that is indeed strange. And then one should really reconsider the possibilities of building [1-geschossig].
 

kaho674

2019-02-24 19:49:01
  • #6
I assume that a two-story townhouse with 135m² of net area was signed for. Usually, the contract states something like "see sketch/plan," from which the two-story design is evident. Since this is not possible on the building plot, the contract could probably be challenged. The simplest solution would certainly be a corresponding change with a new offer from the developer. It is also possible that 135m² of living space was actually signed for and the original poster just mixed up the terminology.
 

Similar topics
16.06.2011Conclude a construction contract under reservation?10
13.09.2012Feeling pressured into a contract, is that normal?17
29.09.2011Is construction pre-planning without signature / contract legally valid?12
22.09.2012Who else fell for a contract with a reservation clause? - Search13
18.02.2014Massive problems with the builder - is contract termination possible?33
16.05.2015Contract unclear: humus earth collectors10
13.06.2015New construction with developer / construction drawing documents23
15.03.2016Developer changes plot size25
10.09.2016Construction financing and contract with the developer24
21.07.2017Buying a terraced house from a developer - contract content?71
30.12.2017Take over the insurance from the developer after handover of keys?15
25.01.2018Developer, condominium - what should one pay attention to?24
29.05.2018Buying a house from a developer - required documents33
30.08.2019Must developers indicate immense embankment height/costs?12
04.03.2019Client-side while building with a property developer16
06.01.2020House purchase, prefabricated house from the developer with land10
13.07.2020Developer does not want to offset lump-sum damages with installments19
03.10.2025Floor plan changes for end-terrace house from the developer134
25.12.2023Behavior in case of imminent delay by the property developer48
18.04.2025The living space is approximately 8 m² smaller in the application drawings compared to the draft (GU).89

Oben